Wims v. State
Wims v. State
215 S.W. 304
(South Western Reporter)
Wims v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant was convicted of transporting intoxicating liquors into a part of the state embraced within the act of the Thirty-Fourth Legislature (chapter 12), known as the Zone Law. See Ex parte Hollingsworth v. State, 203 S. W. 1102.
The record before us is accompanied by no statement of facts, and contains no bills of exception. We find no fundamental vice in the judgment or other proceedings. We must, in the absence of statement of facts, presume the evidence sufficient, and, in the absence of bills of exceptions, that there were no irregularities in the'trial.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.