Appellant was convicted of receiving and concealing stolen property, his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

*743There were two special charges asked, one of which was given and the other refused. The other matters presented by the motion for new trial cannot be reviewed without the testimony, as they relate to and depend upon the facts. The evidence is not before the court; it does not accompany the transcript.

The judgment is affirmed. '