Lee v. State
Lee v. State
229 S.W. 515; 89 Tex. Crim. 62; 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 354
(South Western Reporter)
Lee v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted for violating the tick quarantine law in failing to dip his cattle when directed so to do.
We find the facts practically identical with those-shown in the case of W. B. Walker v. State, this day decided. And the same questions of law are raised in the two cases. Believing the Walker case to have been properly disposed of by affirmance, a discussion of the same questions here would be useless.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.