Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921

Huey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Decided December 7, 1921 · Morrow

235 S.W. 887 (South Western Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

Govance v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1928)
Jones v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1928)
Montez, Del Real v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1925)
Hightower v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1923)
Hill v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1922)
Jacobs v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1922)
Gribble v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1922)
Gribble v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1922)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MORROW, P. J.

Conviction is for keeping a disorderly house; punishment fixed at a fine of $200 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 20 days. [1] AVe find no statement of facts. Copied in the record are the stenographer’s notes in question and answer form. This does not comply with the law requiring a succinct statement of the facts. Vernon’s Ann. Code Cr. Proe. 1916, art. 844c. This court has so held on numerous occasions. Ferguson v. State, 83 Tex. Cr. R. 273, 202 S. W. 733, and cases therein cited; Mooney v. State, 73 Tex. Cr. R. 122, 164 S. W. 828; Felder v. State, 59 Tex. Cr. R. 144, 127 S. W. 1055; Hargrave v. State, 53 Tex. Cr. R. 147, 109 S. W. 163; Fox v. State, 53 Tex; Cr. R. 150, 109 S. W. 370.

[2] In the absence of th' statement of facts, the bills of exceptions .omplaining of the charge of the court present no error. No other bills are found.

The judgment is affirmed.

tg^jPor other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.