Sandstrom v. State
Sandstrom v. State
238 S.W. 226; 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 762
(South Western Reporter)
Sandstrom v. State
Opinion of the Court
Conviction was under article 500, Vernon’s.P. C., charging appellant with beeping a ‘Tiawdyhouse.” Punishment
No statement of facts or bills of exception are brought forward. The motion for new trial ratees only the question of the sufficiency of the evidence, and in its absence presents nothing for review. The proceedings appear regular, and in the condition of the record all things' must be presumed as to the correctness of the judgment.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
(gc5?For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in ali Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.