Araiza v. State
Araiza v. State
268 S.W. 941; 99 Tex. Crim. 305; 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 132
(South Western Reporter)
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Penn v. State (Tex. App. 1982)
- Mayes v. State (Tex. App. 1987)
- Walthall v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1974)
- Hardin v. Estelle (District Court, W.D. Texas 1973)
- Ex Parte Slaton (Tex. Crim. App. 1972)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The offense is burglary; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.
The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears regular. No fundamental error has been discovered or pointed out.
The judgment is affirmed.
, Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.