Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926

Pollock v. State

Pollock v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Decided January 27, 1926 · Berry, Hawkins
280 S.W. 578; 103 Tex. Crim. 155 (South Western Reporter)

Pollock v. State

Addendum

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

In view of the appellant’s motion we have again examined the statement of facts and think the evidence supports the judgment. In the condition of the record, that is, without objection to the charge, no special charges, requested, and no bills of exception, we are of opinion the case has been properly decided.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Judge.

The offense is theft of property over the value of $50.00 and the punishment is five years in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exception contained in the record. The appellant has filed a very lengthy motion for new trial and has attempted to support the allegations contained therein by exparte affidavits. There is nothing raised in the motion for a *156 new trial that can be considered by us under the unbroken rules-of this court in the absence of bills of exception properly preserving the matters presented.

The evidence is entirely sufficient to support the verdict and there being no errors manifested by this record, the judgment, is in all things affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been, examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.