This case is before us on a writ of error. Review of a final judgment forfeiting an appearance bond is sought.

For a discussion of the questions presented by the record herein, see opinion No. 12313, Louise Magless et al. v. State of Texas, 18 S.W.(2d) 669, opinion rendered March 6, 1929, and not yet [officially] reported. Practically the same questions being involved as were presented in the case referred to, the judgment here must also be affirmed. The judgment of the court below is reformed, so as to bear no interest.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

Part of the issues in the present case are the same as those before the court in the case of Jack Smith et al. v. State (No. 12321) 18 S.W.(2d) 672, and discussed in the opinion on motion for rehearing. Upon the reason and authorities there set forth, the motion for rehearing is overruled.