Sutton v. State
Sutton v. State
Opinion of the Court
The offense is possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of excep
In pronouncing sentence the court failed to make application of the provisions of the indeterminate sentence law. The sentence is reformed in order that it may be shown that appellant is condemned to confinement in the penitentiary for not less than one nor more than two )rears.
As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.
A ffirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.