Estell v. State
Estell v. State
48 S.W.2d 256; 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 814
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Estell v. State
Opinion of the Court
Unlawfully possessing a forged instrument is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
The indictment appears regular. The facts ¡heard before the trial court are not brought up for review; nor does the record reveal a sentence. In a felony case less than capital, a sentence is imperative to give this court jurisdiction of the appeal. See article 772, C. C. P. 1925; Dorsey v. State, 114 Tex. Cr. R. 678, 27 S.W.(2d) 186; Williams v. State, 99 Tex. Cr. R. 356, 269 S. W. 434.
The appeal is dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.