Harris v. State
Harris v. State
Opinion of the Court
Theft of an automobile is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
The indictment, judgment and sentence, and the charge of the court all appear regular. The facts heard in the trial court are not brought forward for review. Nothing is perceived from our examination of the record which would warrant a reversal or require discussion.
The judgment is affirmed.
070rehearing
On Motion for Rehearing.
We think the complaint of the judgment of the court herein, because it referred to the offense as “felony theft,” is hypercritical. Other complaints of the transposition of terms and expressions in the record from the exact relationship in which said terms appear in the statute also appear to us to be without any substantial merit.
The motion for rehearing will be overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.