Gray v. State
Gray v. State
Opinion of the Court
The offense is the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
The indictment appears regular and properly presented. A plea of guilty was entered. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.
No error having been perceived or pointed out, the judgment is affirmed.
070rehearing
On Motion for Rehearing.
Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; punishment being two years in the penitentiary.
Near the close of the previous term an opinion was delivered affirming the judgment. Pending a motion for rehearing the law (Pen. ’Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended) under which conviction was had has been repealed (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 49), hence the conviction falls. See Guy Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481, opinion of this date. The motion for rehearing is granted, the judg
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.