Paddock v. State
Paddock v. State
Addendum
*152 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
This appeal was heretofore dismissed on account of a failure to have the notice of appeal passed into the minutes of the trial court. See Art. 827, C. C. P.
There is now filed herein a supplemental transcript showing the orders made by the trial court on its docket, but nowhere therein is it shown that th.e proper orders have been passed into the minutes of the court. That such order showing the giving of a notice of appeal could have been entered at a later term of the court nunc pro tunc is shown by Art. 827, C. C. P. Such, however, has not been done in this case. The supplemental transcript only contains a copy of the judge’s notations on his trial docket, certified to by the district clerk. The record before us still remains in the condition that no notice of appeal is entered in the minutes, and we are therefore without jurisdiction to hear this appeal.
The motion to re-instate is therefore overruled.
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted of burglary, and assessed a penalty of two years in the penitentiary.
No notice of appeal appears to have been entered in the minutes of the trial court. Hence we have no jurisdiction. See Branch’s P. C., Sec. 588, p. 302.
The appeal is dismissed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Charlie Paddock v. the State
- Status
- Published