Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1939

Rushing v. State

Rushing v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Decided March 22, 1939 · Christian, Graves
127 S.W.2d 900; 137 Tex. Crim. 102; 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 318 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Rushing v. State

Addendum

*103 ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. We have re-examined the record in the light of appellant’s motion for rehearing and fail to find that error is presented.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of passing a forged instrument, .and was by the jury awarded three years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears to be in proper form, and all proceedings herein seem to be regular, and we have no other alternative than to affirm the judgment, which is accordingly done.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.