Rushing v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Rushing v. State, 127 S.W.2d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 1939)
137 Tex. Crim. 102; 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 318
Christian, Graves

Rushing v. State

Addendum

*103 ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. We have re-examined the record in the light of appellant’s motion for rehearing and fail to find that error is presented.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of passing a forged instrument, .and was by the jury awarded three years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears to be in proper form, and all proceedings herein seem to be regular, and we have no other alternative than to affirm the judgment, which is accordingly done.

Reference

Full Case Name
Clovis Rushing v. the State
Status
Published