Skaggs v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Skaggs v. State, 124 S.W.2d 127 (Tex. Crim. App. 1939)
Graves, Krueger

Skaggs v. State

Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of receiving and concealing stolen property, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

This cause comes before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears to be proper, and all proceedings herein seem to be regular, and we have no other alternative than to affirm the judgment, which is accordingly done.

070rehearing

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant has filed a motion for a rehearing in which he insists that the indictment is fundamentally defective in that it fails to charge an offense against the laws of this, state. We have again examined the same with much care, but remain of the opinion that it is sufficient to charge the offense for which he was convicted.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Reference

Full Case Name
SKAGGS v. STATE
Status
Published