Rushing v. State
Rushing v. State
127 S.W.2d 893
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Rushing v. State
Opinion of the Court
Conviction is for passing a forged instrument; punishment is assessed at two years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.
The judgment is affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
The foregoing opinion of the- Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.