Crain v. State
Crain v. State
253 S.W.2d 867
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Crain v. State
Opinion of the Court
The conviction is for possession of whis-ky in Taylor County, a- dry area, for the
The state confesses that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction because of the failure to prove that Taylor County was a dry area.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.