Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956

King v. State

King v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Decided February 1, 1956 · Davidson
286 S.W.2d 422; 162 Tex. Crim. 453; 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1242 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

King v. State

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

By Sec. 4, of Art. 93b, Vernon’s R. C. S., it is made unlawful for any person to sell any agricultural seed having a false labeling.

This is a conviction under that statute, with punishment fixed at a fine of $5. The prosecution arose and was commenced in the county court.

The information charges only that the appellant “did then and there unlawfully sell agricultural seed that were falsely labeled.” There is no allegation as to whom the sale was made.

Art. 406, C. C. P., provides that “To charge an unlawful sale, it is necessary to name the purchaser.”

*454 In Keeton v. State, 159 Tex. Cr. R. 431, 264 S. W. 2d 737, we held it necessary that in order to charge the offense of unlawfully selling whisky in a dry area the information must allege the name of the purchaser, if known, and, if unknown, that fact should be alleged. See, also, Hoover v. State, 97 Tex. Cr. R. 91, 259 S. W. 1088.

The information in this case being fatally defective for failing to name the purchaser, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.