Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1957

Hill v. State

Hill v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Decided January 16, 1957 · Woodley
297 S.W.2d 679; 164 Tex. Crim. 146; 1957 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2058 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Hill v. State

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.

The complaint and information alleged that appellant unlawfully sold whisky in a wet area without first having procured a permit to sell such liquor from the Texas Liquor Control Board, or from the administrator of such board.

The offense charged is defined in Art. 666-4 (a) V.A.P.C., and the court, upon appellant’s plea of guilty, entered judgment assessing the punishment at four months in jail, which is within the terms of Sec. 41 of Art. 666 V.A.P.C.

The sole question raised on the appeal is the contention that the punishment applicable to the offense is a fine of not more than $50 as provided in Art. 666-4 (c), Par. 3, V.A.P.C.

Art. 666-4 (c) is a separate section from Art. 666-4 (a) and the punishment provided in Par. 3 of Art. 666-4 (c) applies alone to the offense defined in Paragraph 1 of said Section of *147 Art. 666-4 (c) V.A.P.C. (H.B. 8, Acts 48th Leg., p. 339, Ch. 221, Sec. 1.)

The trial court did not err in applying the punishment fixed in Art. 666-41, V.A.P.C., such being the punishment provided for the violation of any provision of Article 666 for which a definite punishment is not provided. (S.B. 117, Acts 48th Leg., p. 509, Ch. 325, Sec. 8) Hill v. State, 162 Texas Cr. Rep. 331, 290 S.W. 2d 677; Skaggs v. State, 157 Texas Cr. Rep. 195, 247 S.W. 2d 906; Shafer v. State, 151 Texas Cr. Rep. 558, 209 S.W. 2d 599.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.