McCormick v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
McCormick v. State, 323 S.W.2d 462 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)
168 Tex. Crim. 60; 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2449
Dice

McCormick v. State

Opinion

DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction is under Art. 567b, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. for the giving of a worthless check in the amount of $12.95, with punishment assessed at 15 days in jail and a fine of $25.

Our State’s Attorney confesses that there is no valid complaint upon which to base the information.

The complaint fails to allege that the check was given with intent to defraud. The intent to defraud is an essential element of the offense. Art. 567b, Sec. 1, supra; Kuykendall v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R. 607, 160 S.W.2d 525. Being an essential element of the offense, such intent should have been alleged in the complaint. Browder v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 375, 292 S.W.2d 342.

A valid complaint is a prerequisite to a valid information. Addison v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 283 S.W.2d 55.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.

Reference

Full Case Name
Arthur L. McCORMICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published