Slaughter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Slaughter v. State, 336 S.W.2d 944 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960)
170 Tex. Crim. 16; 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2069
Woodley

Slaughter v. State

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge

On a former day of this term the judgment of conviction herein was affirmed and appellant’s first and second motions for rehearing were overruled.

Our attention has now been called to what appears to be a fatal defect in the jury’s verdict. Our prior opinions are therefore withdrawn and the following substituted.

*17 The third count of the indictment alleged the unlawful possession of ethyl morphine, a narcotic drug.

The verdict of the jury which the trial court received and upon which the judgment of conviction was based recites that the jury found appellant guilty and assessed his punishment “at confinement in the State Penitentiary for Five (5).”

The verdict assessed no definite punishment and for that reason is fatally defective. Cooper v. State, 136 Tex. Cr. R. 498, 126 S.W. 2d 974; McCarty v. State, 317 S.W. 2d 748; Bumpass v. State, 160 Tex. Cr. R. 423, 271 S.W 2d 953

The authorities cited are controlling and require that the conviction be set aside.

The order affirming the conviction is set aside and the judgment is now reversed and the cause remanded.

Reference

Full Case Name
Claude Slaughter v. State
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published