Hargiss v. State
Hargiss v. State
170 Tex. Crim. 164
Hargiss v. State
Opinion of the Court
This is a conviction for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors for the purpose of sale in a dry area, with punishment assessed at a fine of $300.
The statement of facts accompanying this record contains no evidence that Morris County, where possession for the purpose of sale is alleged, is a dry area within the meaning of the Liquor Control Act, Art. 666-1, et seq., Vernon’s P. C.
In order for this conviction to be sustained, proof of the dry status of Morris County must be proven or otherwise made to appear. Weatherman v. State, 161 Tex. Cr. R. 272, 276 S. W. 2d 524.
The evidence being insufficient, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.