Thomas v. State
Thomas v. State
170 Tex. Crim. 448
Thomas v. State
Opinion of the Court
This is a writ of error to review the final judgment in a bond forfeiture.
The record sustains appellants’ contention that there was no service of citation upon either of them, for which reason the default judgment making final the forfeiture of the appearance bond upon which they are sureties is without support.
The state agrees and does not seek affirmance.
The judgment making the judgment nisi final is reserved and the cause remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.