Bonham v. State
Bonham v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted, upon his plea of guilty, of the offense of robbery, and his punishment was assessed by a jury at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of 40 years.
John E. Shields, the injured party, called as a witness by the
Appellant’s voluntary written statement, made to Officer M. G. Hall following his arrest, was introduced in evidence by the State, in which he admitted having committed the robbery.
Appellant did not testify or offer any evidence.
There are no formal or informal bills of exception and no brief has been filed on behalf of appellant.
The evidence is sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict.
The judgment is affirmed.
Opinion approved by the Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.