Renty v. State
Renty v. State
Opinion of the Court
Upon waiver of a jury, the appellant was convicted for the offense of giving a check in the sum of $35 without sufficient funds and with the intent to defraud; the punishment, sixty days in jail.
Mrs. Rae Mooney testified that on December 31, 1959, she
The photograph showing both the check and the person presenting it, and the $35 check itself were introduced in evidence. These exhibits and the appellant were before the trial judge.
Mrs. Mooney, while testifying, expressed the opinion that the accused was the same person who presented the check and for whom she cashed it. She also identified the check by her mark of identification.
The proof shows that said check was presented in the due course of business to the named bank and was returned unpaid because the account was closed at all times here in question.
The appellant did not testify or offer any evidence, and no brief has been filed on her behalf.
There are no formal bills of exception, and an examination of the informal bills shows no error.
The evidence is sufficient to support the conviction, and therefore the judgment is affirmed.
Opinion approved by the Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.