Mobley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mobley v. State, 366 S.W.2d 558 (Tex. Crim. App. 1963)
1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 830
Morrison

Mobley v. State

Opinion

Opinion on Application for Leave to File Second Motion for Rehearing.

MORRISON, Judge.

Appellant urges that we were in error in not considering the statement of facts which was tendered. Under Article 759a, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., a statement of facts may be considered when filed after the expiration of the 90 days provided only when the same is approved by the trial judge because the statute says that such approval shall be sufficient proof that the time for filing was properly extended.

We may not consider what purports to be a nunc pro tunc entry of an order overruling appellant’s motion for new trial tendered in a supplemental transcript because the same was entered while the case was on appeal in this Court and the trial court was without any authority to enter any order during that time. Allen v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 642, 65 S.W.2d 311, and Colbert v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 331 S.W.2d 328.

Application for permission to file second motion for rehearing is denied.

Reference

Full Case Name
Donald Foster MOBLEY, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published