Bautista v. State
Bautista v. State
416 S.W.2d 409
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Bautista v. State
Concurring Opinion
CONCURRING OPINION
I concur in the results reached for the reasons set forth in my concurring opinion in Aguirre v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 416 S.W.2d 406.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION
This is an appeal by Ralph Napier, surety on a bail bond, from a judgment making final a judgment nisi forfeiting such bond.
The bond in the sum of $300 was conditioned that Juan Bautista appear in County Court at Law No. One of Bexar County to answer a complaint and information charging him with a misdemeanor.
The same questions are presented as in Aguirre et al, v. State of Texas, Tex.Cr.App., 416 S.W.2d 406.
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.