Mink v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mink v. State, 421 S.W.2d 668 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967)
1967 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1098
Woodley

Mink v. State

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The offense is Driving While Intoxicated; the punishment confinement in the county jail for three (3)~ days and by a fine of $135.00.

Sentence was pronounced on February 2, 1967, and notice of appeal was given on March 6, 1967.

Notice of appeal was not given within the time prescribed by Article 44.08(c), Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., and there is nothing in the record to show that the trial court for good cause shown permitted the giving of such notice after the ten (10) days allowed had expired.

The appeal is dismissed.

OPINION

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

It is shown by supplemental transcript that the trial judge permitted appellant to give notice of appeal after the expiration of 10 days from the date of sentence.

The motion to reinstate the appeal is granted.

No brief for appellant has been filed setting forth any ground of error and we find none which should be reviewed in the interest of justice. See Art. 40.09, Sections 9 and 13, V.A.C.C.P.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

The offense is Driving While Intoxicated; the punishment confinement in the county jail for three (3) days and by a fine of $135.00.

Sentence was pronounced on February 2, 1967, and notice of appeal was given on March 6, 1967.

Notice of appeal was not given within the time prescribed by Article 44.08(c), Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., and there is nothing in the record to show that the trial court for good cause shown permitted the giving of such notice after the ten (10) days allowed had expired.

The appeal is dismissed.

OPINION

Addendum

It is shown by supplemental transcript that the trial judge permitted appellant to give notice of appeal after the expiration of 10 days from the date of sentence.

The motion to reinstate the appeal is granted.

No brief for appellant has been filed setting forth any ground of error and we find none which should be reviewed in the interest of justice. See Art. 40.09, Sections 9 and 13, V.A.C.C.P.

The judgment is affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Robert Lee MINK v. The STATE of Texas
Status
Published