Hollis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Hollis v. State, 436 S.W.2d 341 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969)
1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 932
Belcher, Douglas

Hollis v. State

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

The conviction is for robbery by assault; the punishment was assessed at ten years which was probated.

The appellant did not comply with Section 9 of Article 40.09, Vernon’s Ann.C.C. P., in that he did not file a brief in the trial court “(w)ithin thirty days after approval of the record by the court” or during any additional period which the court authorized setting forth the grounds of error of which he desires to complain on appeal. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797; Yarbrough v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 408 S.W.2d 230; Melick v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 *342S.W.2d 412; Dewitt v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 852; Ochoa v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 424 S.W.2d 642.

There is no showing of indigency.

Nothing appears in the record which should be considered as unassigned error under Section 13 of Article 40.09, supra.

The judgment is affirmed.

DOUGLAS, J., not participating.

Reference

Full Case Name
Dan Gilbert HOLLIS v. The STATE of Texas
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published