Ramirez v. State
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Ramirez v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1972)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION
The conviction is for the possession of heroin; the punishment, ten years imprisonment.
The appellant’s court-appointed counsel on appeal has filed a brief which raises no ground of error and states “Counsel further finds there is no other error upon which a non-frivolous appeal might be based.” The record does not reflect that a copy of the brief was served upon the appellant as is required by Anders v. Calfornia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969); Holder v. State, 469 S.W.2d 184 (Tex.Crim.App. 1971); Barber v. State, 471 S.W.2d 814 (Tex.Crim.App. 1971). This appeal will be abated until the record shows that there has been a compliance with the above cited authorities. See Simmons v. State, 475 S.W.2d 787 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Ex parte
For the reasons stated, the appeal is abated.
Opinion approved by the court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.