Adams v. State
Cases that cite this one
24 later published cases cite this decision.
- Shawntrell Dawkins v. State (Tex. App. 2016)
- Woods v. State (Tex. App. 1991)
- Beltran v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1987)
- King v. State (Tex. App. 1987)
- Osban v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1986)
- People v. Ruggles (Cal. 1985)
- Gardner v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1985)
- Leeroy Randy Sanchez v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2025)
- Pedro Castelo Amancio v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2021)
- Jesus Chavez v. State (Tex. App. 2018)
- Bobo v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)
- Riley v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)
- Cortez v. State (Tex. App. 1990)
- Lawson v. State (Tex. App. 1988)
- Padgett v. State (Tex. App. 1987)
- Higbie v. State (Tex. App. 1987)
- Bass v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1987)
- Lucas v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1986)
- Roeder v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1985)
- Troncosa v. State (Tex. App. 1984)
- Porier v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1984)
- Hudson v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1984)
- Schmidt v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1983)
- Adams v. State (Tex. App. 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION
Appellant was convicted of the offense of possession of methamphetamine, and punishment was assessed at imprisonment for four years. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and remanded the cause to the trial court for entry of a judgment of acquittal. Adams v. State, (Tex.App.—Houston [14th] 1982).
We find the reasons for review advanced by the State to be without merit, with one exception. The Court of Appeals erred in directing that a judgment of acquittal be entered in this case. The admission of the unlawfully seized evidence was trial error, and the proper remedy is to reverse the conviction and remand the cause for a new trial. Collins v. State, 602 S.W.2d 537 (Tex.Cr.App. 1980).
The State’s petition for discretionary review is granted, and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.