Armendarez v. State
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision.
- in Re Samuel Roy Jackson (Tex. App. 2013)
- Ex Parte Jesse Ruiz v. the State of Texas (Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) 2025)
- George Alvarez v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2025)
- Ex Parte Angel Rey Perez v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2023)
- Florencio Palomares, Jr. v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2021)
- Florencio Palomares, Jr. v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2021)
- Ex Parte Everett Madurai (Tex. App. 2019)
- Ex Parte Christian Rodriguez (Tex. App. 2018)
- Michael Alexander v. State (Tex. App. 2014)
- Zaratti, C. Tom (Tex. Crim. App. 2004)
- Baquee Antar Sabur v. State (Tex. App. 2003)
- Baquee Antar Sabur v. State (Tex. App. 2003)
- Criner v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1994)
- Bennet v. State (Tex. App. 1991)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION
This is a direct appeal from the denial of bail pursuant to the provisions of Article I, Section 11a of the Texas Constitution, which provides in part that an accused may be held without bond if he is accused of committing a felony less than capital while on bail for a prior felony. Appellant was accused by felony complaint No. 0414849 of the offense of illegal investment on August 10, 1990. A hearing was held at which the State presented evidence that appellant had committed the charged offense while out on bail for the offense of delivery of a controlled substance, Cause No. 0399769A. The trial court ordered appellant held without bail.
In light of appellant’s conviction in Cause No. 0414849A on October 4, 1990, and the subsequent assessment of punishment at life imprisonment, we find the issue on appeal to be moot.
Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s appeal from the denial of bail.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.