Cox v. State
Cases that cite this one
33 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Brown v. State (Tex. App. 1999)
- Clinton Ray Sanders v. State (Tex. App. 2014)
- State v. Consaul (Tex. Crim. App. 1998)
- Esteban Hernandez v. the State of Texas (Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) 2025)
- Mark Jabben v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2024)
- Mario Hernandez v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2021)
- Zackary Young v. State (Tex. App. 2019)
- Cleveland Jerod Thomas v. State (Tex. App. 2015)
- Elizabeth Monnique Duerson v. State (Tex. App. 2013)
- Gregg Carl Baird v. State (Tex. App. 2012)
- David Jackson v. State (Tex. App. 2012)
- David Jackson v. State (Tex. App. 2012)
- Nathan Collins v. State (Tex. App. 2011)
- Nathan Collins v. State (Tex. App. 2011)
- Treola Hawkins v. State (Tex. App. 2009)
- Treola Hawkins v. State (Tex. App. 2009)
- Gunnar Eric Austin v. State (Tex. App. 2008)
- Mario Martinez, Jr. v. State (Tex. App. 2008)
- Mario Martinez, Jr. v. State (Tex. App. 2008)
- Ziolkowski v. State (Tex. App. 2007)
- Cory Ziolkowski v. State (Tex. App. 2007)
- Jack Harris Woods v. State (Tex. App. 2005)
- Jack Harris Woods v. State (Tex. App. 2005)
- Derrick Maurice Webster A/K/A Derrick Morris Webster v. State (Tex. App. 2004)
- Derrick Maurice Webster A/K/A Derrick Morris Webster v. State (Tex. App. 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANTS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
The appellant, Robert Craig Cox, was charged by indictment for the felony offense of aggravated robbery. A jury found appellant guilty of the offense charged and found two enhancement paragraphs to be true. Punishment was assessed at life imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Cox v. State, 931 S.W.2d 349 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1996). We granted the appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in finding that the trial court abused its discretion in restraining appellant during trial without first entering findings justifying the restraint, and then holding that error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. After careful review of the appellate record, the Court of Appeals’ opinion and the briefs and oral arguments before this Court, we conclude that our decision to grant review was improvident. Accordingly, the appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed. Tex. R.App. P. 202(k).
Petition for Discretionary Review dismissed.
BAIRD, J., dissents with the following note: BAIRD, J., dissents for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Ex parte Ramirez, 919 S.W.2d 435, 436 (Tex.Cr.App. 1996), and Houston v. State, 846 S.W.2d 848 (Tex.Cr.App. 1993).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.