Gerron v. State
Cases that cite this one
28 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Archie v. State (Tex. App. 2006)
- Steels v. State (Tex. App. 2005)
- Conde v. State (Tex. App. 2004)
- David Heath Fouse v. State (Tex. App. 2010)
- David Heath Fouse v. State (Tex. App. 2010)
- David Heath Fouse v. State (Tex. App. 2010)
- David Heath Fouse v. State (Tex. App. 2010)
- David Heath Fouse v. State (Tex. App. 2010)
- David Heath Fouse v. State (Tex. App. 2010)
- David Heath Fouse v. State (Tex. App. 2010)
- David Heath Fouse v. State (Tex. App. 2010)
- David Heath Fouse v. State (Tex. App. 2010)
- Clarence Wesley Haley v. State (Tex. App. 2009)
- Jason Bradley Fears v. State (Tex. App. 2009)
- Ard v. State (Tex. App. 2006)
- State v. Bailey (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)
- in Re: Billy Joe Patton (Tex. App. 2006)
- in Re: Anthony E. Gill (Tex. App. 2006)
- Bailey, Cameron O. (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)
- Pena v. State (Tex. App. 2005)
- Frank v. State (Tex. App. 2005)
- Kesey Darnell Frank v. State (Tex. App. 2005)
- Kesey Darnell Frank v. State (Tex. App. 2005)
- Julius Archie v. State (Tex. App. 2005)
- Janet Clanton Leonard v. State (Tex. App. 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION
A jury found Appellant guilty of the offense of misdemeanor DWI and the trial court sentenced him to 90 days in jail and a $1000 fine, probated for two years. At trial and on appeal, Appellant claimed that the trial court erred in denying him an Article 38.23, V.A.C.C.P. instruction regarding whether Appellant had faded to maintain a single lane of traffic. The Court of Appeals, with one justice dissenting, held however that Appellant was entitled to an article 38.23 jury instruction concerning whether a police officer could stop Appellant outside of his geographical jurisdiction and reversed and remanded the case to the trial court. Gerron v. State, 57 S.W.3d 568 (Tex.App.-Waco 2001, pet. filed). The State filed a petition for discretionary review contending in its first ground for review that the Court of Appeals reversed the case on a theory never presented to the trial court or raised on appeal. We recently held that an appellate court cannot reverse a case on a theory not presented to the trial court or raised on appeal. Hailey v. State, 87 S.W.3d 118 (Tex.Crim.App. 2002).
Accordingly, we grant ground one of the State’s petition for discretionary review, vacate the Court of Appeals’ judgment, and remand this case to the Court of Appeals in light of Hailey. The remaining grounds for review are dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.