IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,038

EX PARTE REGINALD LAMONT HOOPER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR-24533-A IN THE 217 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM ANGELINA COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault of a public servant and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. The Tenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction after remand from this Court. Hooper v. State, No. 10-04-00265-CR (Tex. App. – Waco, March 12, 2008).

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely advise him of his right to file petition for discretionary review pro se. We remanded

2 this application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Tenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 10-04-00265-CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. CR-24533-A from the 217th Judicial District Court of Angelina County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the Tenth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues. Delivered: November 26, 2008 Do not publish