This is a post conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.071.

In June 2005, a jury convicted applicant of the offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant's conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Richardson v. State, No. AP-75,200 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 23, 2008 ) (not designated for publication).

Applicant presents nine allegations in which she challenges the validity of her conviction and sentence. Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial judge entered agreed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court found that applicant was entitled to relief on her allegation that the State, through its prosecutor Mike Parrish, failed to reveal Brady material regarding an examination of its key witness by a psychologist, which affected the punishment phase of her trial. The court recommended that relief should be granted and that applicant should receive a new punishment trial.

This Court has reviewed the record with respect to the allegations made by applicant. The trial judge's findings and conclusions are supported by the record. Relief is granted, and this case is remanded to the trial court for new punishment proceedings. All other relief is denied.

DELIVERED: November 2, 2011

DO NOT PUBLISH