Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2012

Chande, Ex Parte Hamis Athoman

Chande, Ex Parte Hamis Athoman
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Decided November 14, 2012

Chande, Ex Parte Hamis Athoman

Opinion











IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. PD-0976-12

EX PARTE HAMIS ATHOMAN CHANDE, Appellant


v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS



ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

MCLENNEN COUNTY

Per curiam. Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.

ORDER

The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b), because the original petition is not accompanied by eleven (11) copies.

The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas within thirty (30) days after the date of this order.

En banc.



Delivered: November 14, 2012

Do Not Publish.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑