Flores, Damian Ricardo
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Roderick Beham v. State (Tex. App. 2015)
- Richard Darby v. State (Tex. App. 2015)
- Rueben Justin Trejo v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2023)
- Linda Dooley v. State (Tex. App. 2020)
- Manuel Espino-Cruz v. State (Tex. App. 2019)
- Marvin Ray August v. State (Tex. App. 2018)
- Anthony Deron Carr v. State (Tex. App. 2016)
- Genaro Galvan Acosta Jr. v. State (Tex. App. 2015)
- Jason B Jackson v. State (Tex. App. 2015)
- Acosta, Genaro Galvan Jr. (Tex. App. 2015)
- Acosta, Genaro Galvan Jr. (Tex. App. 2015)
- Damian Ricardo Flores v. State (Tex. App. 2014)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION
Appellant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to 20 years in prison. On appeal, he argued, among other things, that the evidence was insufficient to support the $905 in court costs assessed against him in the judgment. The Court of Appeals agreed, relying on its opinion in Johnson v. State, 389 S.W.3d 513 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2012). Flores v. State, No. 14-12-00623-CR, - S.W.3d -, 2013 WL 5470048 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] October 1, 2013).
The State has filed a petition for discretionary review of this decision. We recently handed down our opinion in Johnson v. State, 423 S.W.3d 385 (Tex.Crim.App. 2014), in which we set forth a road-map for resolving questions regarding court costs. See also Cardenas v. State, 423 S.W.3d 396 (Tex.Crim.App. 2014).
*400 The Court of Appeals in the instant case did not have the benefit of our opinion in Johnson. Accordingly, we grant the State’s petition for discretionary review, vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand this case to the Court of Appeals in light of our opinion in Johnson. We also this day refuse Appellant’s petition for discretionary review in this case. No motion for rehearing will be entertained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.