Wendolyn Messner, as Dependent Administrator v. Mark L. Boon, and Boon Shaver Echols Coleman & Goolsby, P.L.L.C.
Wendolyn Messner, as Dependent Administrator v. Mark L. Boon, and Boon Shaver Echols Coleman & Goolsby, P.L.L.C.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 06-14-00020-cv SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 1/7/2015 1:33:34 PM DEBBIE AUTREY CLERK
No. 06-14-00020-CV ________________________________________________________________ FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS In the Court of Appeals of Texas TEXARKANA, TEXAS Sixth District 1/14/2015 9:10:00 AM Texarkana, Texas DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk ________________________________________________________________
WENDOLYN MESSNER, DEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR Appellant
v.
MARK L. BOON, BOON SHAVER ECHOLS COLEMAN & GOOLSBY, P.L.L.C., Appellees ________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law of Rusk County, Texas Hon. Chad Wes Dean Trial Court Cause No. 02-043 A ________________________________________________________________
APPELLANT’S SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR REHEARING ________________________________________________________________
PAUL W. TURNER Texas Bar No. 24037619 400 S. Alamo, Suite A Marshall, Texas 75670 (903) 935-0135 (phone) (903) 935-0235 (facsimile) [email protected] COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT
1 SUPPLEMENT TO ARGUMENT
In Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, Appellant argued that the Court had
erred in some of its legal analysis on page 20 of its Opinion.1 In an effort to more
succinctly state the flaw in the Court’s analysis, Wendolyn submits this
Appellant’s Supplement to Motion for Rehearing.
The Court has held that Wendolyn can brings claims against Boon for any
negligent act that he committed during Delbert’s lifetime,2 but she cannot bring
claims for any negligent act that Boon committed during Bengel’s administration
of Delbert’s estate because any such negligence was an injury to Bengel.3 But, as
the Court rightly observed on page 19 of its Opinion, Bengel stood in the shoes of
Delbert as the executor of his estate. Therefore, an injury to Bengel was an injury
to Delbert, and the Court has acknowledged that Wendolyn can bring claims for an
injury to Delbert.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Paul W. Turner____________ Paul W. Turner Texas Bar No. 24037619 400 S. Alamo, Suite A Marshall, Texas 75670 903-935-0135 (phone) 903-935-0235 (facsimile) [email protected] Counsel for Appellant 1 Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, p. 15-18. 2 Opinion, p. 19. 3 Opinion, p. 20-21.
2 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
The Appellant’s Supplement to Motion for Hearing contains 159 which, if the Court allows this Supplement, results in a total count of 4,616 words which exceeds the 4,500 word limit of with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i).
Signed on January 7, 2015.
/s/ Paul W. Turner____________ Paul W. Turner
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on January 7, 2015, I served a copy of Appellant’s Supplement to Motion for Rehearing on counsel for Appellees listed below by electronic service and the electronic transmission was reported as complete. My email address is [email protected].
Michael L. Dunn Smead, Anderson & Dunn 2110 Horseshoe Lane Longview, Texas 75605 Counsel for Appellees Mark L. Boon and Boon Shaver Echols Coleman & Goolsby, P.L.L.C.
/s/ Paul W. Turner____________ Paul W. Turner
3
Reference
- Status
- Published