J'Z_/\S`- 00/?`0~ c/C IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FH_ED ,N _ The Court of Appeals siXTH DisTRICT Sixrh oismcr TEXARKANA, TEXAs .@C`l` l 5 2915 _ 4 Texa§k<atma., ireva Jack H. Meyer, Pro se, MoVANT § 'Deb'“a ’K~ ’AW@‘)V, ©terr+r< § vs. §CAUSE # 2014-0801-¢¢1, 2015-9859-CCL §CAUsE # 41-72002, 41-72003, 41-73221 THE sTATE oF TEXAS § HCJP 4-1 HARRIsoN Co. CoURT AT LAW § HARRISON CO. JP COURT Prct 4, Placel § HARRISON CO. DISTRICT ATTORNEY § RESPONDENT §

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

TO THE HONRABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: Comes now Jack H. l\/Ieyer, of 403 Houston st. Jefferson, Texas 75657,and . petition this court to issue a Writ of l\/landamus pursuant to Rule 72.l & 72.2 of Texas Rules of Appellate Procedures, 9/1/06 to the movant, Jacl< H. Meyer, ordering the presiding Judge of Harrison County Court at Law, l\/Ir. Joe Black, and the presiding Harrison County Justice of the Peace of Prct. 4, Place l, l\/Is Nancy Schnorbus George, and Harrison County District Attorney, l\/Ir. Coke Soloman to complete without delay their ministerial duty to prove theirjurisdiction challenged by the movant in pre-trials and trials or, dismiss all causes against him and return all bonds paid by him in these matters immediately.

Page 9 ot`24 II. _111.

IV.

VI.

VII.

VIII. lssUEs PREsENTED

Failure of accuser to prove Constitutional jurisdiction when challenged by the Sovereign.

Failure of court to prove Constitutional jurisdiction when challenged by the Sovereign.

Willful denial by the court of the, authority by right, of the Sovereign to challenge The administrative and J udicial .lurisdiction of the courts.

The intentional failures of the courts to carry out a Constitutional duty to the Sovereign, that being the duty to see justice done by due process of judicial law.

The exercise of the powers of government to obstruct justice in the conduct of a Constitutional duty to the Sovereign.

Intentional exercise of an authority not Constitutionally granted, that being police power over the Sovereign.

Abuse of office of multiple public officials Breach of Contract by multiple public officials PagelO of24 _STATE MENT OF THE CASE I, Jack H. Meyer, was issued three (3) traffic citations by Texas Department of Safety for the alleged violation of Texas Traffic Statutes, those being as follows n a. 6/26/2009, Citation #TX094XOFR0003, for not employing my seat belt. b. 7/13/2014, Citation #TX135201KC008, for not employing my seat belt & driving with an expired drivers license; c. 5/26/2014, Citation #TX42580PRMR8, driving with expired drivers license & Display of expired registration In the issuance of each of the above citations I attempted to inform the officer of the fact that l was a sovereign citizen of Texas not engaged in any act that brought me under the jurisdiction of Texas administrative statutes That l was simply a private citizen enjoying my right to freely travel without injuring anyone and not in the authority of the State to regulate my activity in any way. Simply put, l was not in the jurisdiction of the State government and there existed no authority of the State to impede or diminish my right to drive my vehicle on my highway.` I attempted to explain how l arrived at my interpretation of the law but none of the officers indicated any interest is hearing it and promptly issued the citations All citations being non-jailable offenses, the officer informed me that ifl did not sign the citation l would be arrested and taken tojail. l then signed all tickets with the notation “Signed Under Duress” and was allowed to.go on about my business l then contacted the administrative tribunals having territorial jurisdiction of the citation and filed a l\/Iotion to Dismiss, Challenge of.lurisdiction, and a detailed Page l l br24 explanation of what their jurisdiction was, as an administrative tribunal and magistrate l also included a detailed explanation of Police Power and a Challenge of Jurisdiction with many rulings of the Supreme Court of the United States of America on the subjects What followed these filings by me was a five (5) year delay of any further action in the matter of the citations by the Harrison County Justice Court Prct 4.

Pl'ace l to which I have any notice or knowledge I attempted on two (2) occasions, over the 5 yr. period, to find out what was going on with my citations by speaking directly with the JP, Ms Nancy Schnorbus George, but she was never available and only her office help told they didn’t know anything On one occasion I tried to speak with her in her office with the same result. To this day l have never heard her voice or seen her face. She has never appeared at any hearing or trial on-the matters of these citations, only the State’s attorneys and some other JP, I assume, who’s name l have no knowledge of or find his name or signature on the documents of the trial of these matters he conducted Because of the unusual conduct of these matters, that is to say my inability to communicate with the JP Court or Justice concerning these citations, l included in my later filings a letter to Justice George asking what was going on. And, explaining the ramifications of the obvious lack of action by the JP to expend due diligence in the conduct of her office To say the least I had some very troubling questions about her administration of her Constitutionally created office and her duty to the people who employ her.

Page 12 of24 Finally on 5/31/2014 she notified me by 15‘. class mail that resolution of the matters by pretrial would begin on 8/14/2014 at 9:00am. In that notice only two (2) causes were referenced, 41 -68856' and 41-68857. I had no way of determining which of the citations these causes referred to but believed that confusion would be cleared during pretrial.

The 8/14/2014 pretrial hearing was only a meeting between myself and the assistant district attorney of Harrison County. This hearing was not in the presence of the JP or in the court room. The assistant DA started the meeting by informing me that this was a serious matter and that I should surrender to his will by accepting the citations and paying the fines or suffer the full weight of the law. l promptly informed him I would not and that l would accept only the trial and by jury. This caused the young man to become more than a little upset with me and he explained that my understanding of law was so completely wrong that when combined with the letter sent to the JP it bordered on more serious violations of law of which he would also convict me. With that communicated he stood up and proceeded to leave the room. 1 then notified him of the challenge of g jurisdiction which he was compelled to obey before any trial on the matter proceeded He had by that time entered the courtroom where others were waiting. His reply was that the challenge was not going to be taken up and he left my presence in a very angry state. I did not then know if he meant that the challenge would not be addressed in pretrial or trial. All I knew was that he was not going to discuss the matter right then.

What followed was a notice from the JP by Certified mail on 9/1 1/2014 that trial was set for 10/8/2014 at 9:00am.

Page 13 of24 I arrive for trial at 8:30am and awaited my turn before the court. I find that the jury has already been selected and empanelled in the jury box. l then found out there would be no Voir Dire. When the trial begins the man presiding is unknown to me and I ask who he is and why Justice George is not conducting the proceedings He informs me that justice George will not be conducting the trial and that he is I believe he stated that he was the Hallsville, Texas JP and was acting in her behalf but can not be certain of that now. We proceeded with trial, he informed me of the causes against me and asked how I pleaded. I replied innocent and then reminded him there was the matter of the challenge of jurisdiction before the court and it must be resolved before any further proceedings were allowed by law. The justice bluntly stated he would not entertain any such challenge. l informed him of my objection and informed the court reporter that all of the words spoken in the trial had better be on the record. The justice informed me this court was not a court of record. l then informed him the law-allowed no discretion in the Challenge, that it was not in his authority to ignore one. He then interrupted me and denied the challenge and instructed me to prove myjurisdiction. Before I could speak he informed me that the letter 1 had sent Justice George, which he was holding, was so serious a threat that he could charge me with threatening a judge. l then informed him that I not only objected to the denial of challenge bu/t the entire proceedings He replied that my only option was to accept his instructed verdict of guilty and appeal the ruling. Knowing this court was not interested in any justice and my only option was an appeal I accepted the ruling, with objection. l notified the court of my intention to appeal. The man informed me there would be a bond required and that l had ten days to file my notice of appeal with the JP court. We all then retired from the courtroom.

Page 14 of24 I then filed my notice of appeal (Exhibit 2) with the Harrison County Clerks office, tendered my $884.00 cash appeal bond and asked the Clerk, Ms Cox, what was required of me next. She replied that the Clerks office would notify me by mail.

On 11/7/2014 I received a postcard from the Harrison County Criminal District Attorney informing me of that I-was to appear before the Harrison County Court at Law in the matter ofcause # 2014-0801 on 11/18/2014 at 9:OOam. l I appear in the Harrison County Court at Law, believing it is in the matter of my appeal to‘that court. The judge presiding was Judge Ammerman, who was soon to be replaced by the newly elected judge Black. Judge Ammerman wished to leave the matter of my appeal to incoming Judge Black and set no court date at this hearing. I returned home to await Judge Black’s communication of his intentions in the appeal.

On 3/20/2015 I receive a USPO notice of attempt to deliver a certified mail. lt is too late on this day, Friday, to pick it up at the post office and I am delayed until the following Monday, 3/23/2015, to pick up the mail. This certified mail contains: (Exibit 3a) 1. What I believe is ajudgment ofthe Harrison County Court at Law of failing to appear in cause # 2014-0801 on 1/20/2015, causing my appeal bond to be forfeited (Exhibit 3b) ~ 2. What I believe is a form of some charge, it is a blank form,‘ except for the hand written cause number at the top, Civil cause # 2015-9859 and typed Criminal cause # 2014-0801. (Exhibit 3c) 3. A trial setting notice of the above noted civil and criminal causes on 9/10/2015 at 2:30pm and signed byjudge .loe Black. (Exhibit 3d) 4. A statement ofBaliff, l\/lr. l-Ienderson, stating 1 had not appeared at a Page 15 of24 pretrial hearing/(a hand written word 1 can not read) on 1/20/2015 of causes 2014-0801 and or 2015-9859, and signed by Baliff Henderson. (Exhibit 3e) 5. A photocopy of the personal check 1 tendered for my appeal bond, that lwas declined and returned to me. 1 paid bond with a cashiers check from my local bank, copied on reverse of original photocopy. (Exhibit 3f) 6. A judgment NSIS ordering my forfeiture of bond and, 1 believe, my arrest for failing to appear in court on 1/20/2015 in causes 2014-0801 and or 2015-9859, being signed by judge Black. (Exhibit 3g) immediately stop every thing 1 am doing and respond via certified mail in sworn affidavit, that 1 do not have~nor have 1 had any notice of any hearing or trial for any matter before the courts of Harrison Co., not a postcard, 1Sl class mail, certified mail or hand delivered notice. 1 object to'the charge and remind the court that a unanswered challenge ofjurisdiction exist in the matter of cause #2014-0801 which makes further proceedings without effect. 1 also explain that when a public official exceeds his authority he also exits his sovereign immunity. The proof of delivery card for this reply shows it was mailed and received on 3/25/2015, well within the stated time limit in the above documents of the court. (Exhibit 4) » On 7/31/2015 1 receive a certified notice from the Harrison County Court ofa judgment NSIS hearing in cause 2015-9859-CCL has been reset for 9/17/2015 at 2:30pm, and signed by Judge Black.

Page |6 of24 `On 9/17/2015 1 appear in Harrison County Court and am promptly arrested for failing to appear at not just a hearing in Harrison County Court but three (3) additional causes before the Harrison County Justice Court Prct. 4, Place 1. To say that 1 am surprised would be a gross understatement 1 am handed a memo by Judge Black resetting cause 2015-9859 to 10/1/2015. 1 am jailed in Harrison Co. Jail and put under a total of $3,500.00 bond (Exhibit 5). Being Pro Se it is now impossible for me to defend myself. 1t is only by the physical and financial help of friends that 1 make CASH bond and gain my release, which 1 do on the evening of 10/20/15.

1n my release documents 1 become aware of three (3) more new causes held against me, 41-72002, 41 -72003 and 41-73221. 1 can only assume they stem from Harrison Co JP court Prct 4, Place 1 because of the “41 ” numbers 1 have no knowledge of any matter before that justice court. All the matters 1 do have knowledge of are in Harrison County Court. 1 now know what is afoot in Harrison Co., it is the very same tactic employed against me by the 1\/1arshall Municipal court to make life as hard as possible on me to extort my submission. They however backed down when 1 informed them of notice requirements of law and released me from jail. 1 have never failed to appear at any hearing or trial 1 had knowledge of. 1 was not notified!

1 am now working to assemble my defense against all of these charges A task that requires me to stop all other matters 1\/1y business is shut down, all other commitments am involved in have stopped, This matter.now requires all of my resources to assemble my defense. Against who? The very people we hired to protect us!

4 Page 17 of24 STATE MENT OF THE FACTS Beginning at the issuance of all traffic citations in this matter 1 informed all concerned they enjoyed no jurisdiction over me in my private activity. 1 also informed them that all administrative statutes were only internal rules and regulations of the y government having no force or effect on the sovereign citizen. Subsequently, 1 filed under sworn affidavit documents to bring dismissal of the charges and written challenges of their jurisdiction to make or enforce law over any sovereign citizen. These documents and the force of law they invoke were disregarded, denied and the requirements of them violated by all officials involved.

Without doubt the government officials involved in this violation have acted to _ avoid exposure of their violations by bringing false charges against Jack H. Meyer, thereby assassinating my character, inflicting great pain, suffering and injury. They stop proceedings in the cause that is challenged and proceed with causes of their own huenuomthmebykeqnngbeknedw}nmhcsonmdnngdwylwhevedwycanconuof Proceedings only and completely in the favor of the officials and{all without authority. ln the process no court in which any traffic citation against Jack H. Meyer was brought has ever been prosecuted, not one out of about 15 at this time! No court, once c'hallenged, has ever proven its jurisdiction to prosecute Jack H. l\/Ieyer. They have only acted as the Harrison County Courts are now or do nothing, leaving the matter in limbo, not prosecuted or dismissed, as the Harrison County'.lustice George and all other courts have.

Page 18 0f24` ARGUl\/IENT THEREON

This case 1 bring before you Sirs comes down to one very clear requirement of law, Jurisdiction. Every government official 1 have challenged in accordance with law has neither proved jurisdiction, tried to prove jurisdiction, allowed any argument in court of jurisdiction, and denied outright the right of the accused to challenge jurisdiction One justice even ordered me to prove my own jurisdiction Unfortunately, 1 did not have my birth certificate with me at that time and could not. An error 1 quickly corrected!

The issue is not that jurisdiction does or does not exist, it is the failure of the court to know it exist, the failure of the court to determine that it in fact has jurisdiction when jurisdiction is brought into question and the failure to show proof to its employer when it is required by law.

When any reasonably intelligent man observes the extent to which the courts have gone to avoid proving jurisdiction it is undeniable that they DO NOT WISH TO PROVE IT. 1f they did this request would not be before you now. Without doubt, this problem is systemic, it is nationwide, the Supreme Law of this nation is being overthrown And, it is being done by the very people we elected to obey and administer it.

Jurisdiction is the most important requirement of any law. lt is the first and foremost matter before any court in this land. lt is the one determination from which all further authority must and does stem. This one simple fact of all law is so well settled it is self evident. Withoutjurisdiction there can be no justice. lt simply can not exist OutSiCl€ authOrity. (The laws of our intellectual nature do not allow it. “The creator has authority over it’s(his) creation”.)

Page 19 0f24 The issue before a court has no bearing on its requirement to have jurisdiction Jurisdiction is required by all courts and in all matters And, for justice to be rendered the judge of that court must have personal knowledge of that jurisdiction To believe otherwise is to leave justice to the whims of hearsay. A court can be whatever it wants if its administrator is allowed to act on whatever authority he believes he has Any court that does is notjudicial, its vigilante at best, The requirement of jurisdiction is so fundamental to our system of justice that there is no need of any evidence for or against any allegation of lack of jurisdiction 1f only the fact that it is not known by a court then this court knows authority is not present. At this point it is the duty of the Appellate Court to require proof of jurisdiction from all lower courts, our law leaves no alternative 1t should be sufficient for this court to have only a sworn allegation of failure to to prove jurisdiction, when challenged in that court, for it to order, in all courts in its district, that proof is to be produced, displayed and recorded in' all courts before they may proceed Absent that proof no jurisdiction exist, the cause does not exist, and must be dismissed This is a nation under law, not man The law must be obeyed! (The Constitution ofthe United States of America)(The Constitution ofthe State ofTexas) This writ of mandamus sought under the facts of this case show that a ministerial act of both the Harrison County Court at law judge, .loe Black, on appeal from, and the Harrison County Justice of the Peace Prct. 4, Place l, Ms Nancy Schnorbus George failed to prove jurisdiction in the matter before their courts when challenged by the accused And, when demanded in trial denied the challenge and summarily convicted the accused by instructed verdict. - l\/lov_ant has repeatedly and properly requested performance but was refused Page 20 of24 PRAYER WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Ma_nt, Jack H. Meyer, prays that this petition for a Writ of Mandamus be granted ordering the presiding judge of the Harrison County Court at Law, Joe Black, and the presiding justice of the Harrison County Justice Court, Prct. 4, Place l, Nancy Schnorbus George, carry out their ministerial duty and prove their respective jurisdictions in the matters of Jack H. Meyer, or dismiss the causes against him.

Movant also prays that the written proof tendered for their respective jurisdiction be immediately communicated in writing to this court for its consideration, and notification to those courts and movant of your judgment thereof.

Movant also prays that this court order that all proceedings in the matter of Jack H.

Meyer in the courts of Harrison Co. Texas be stopped until the judgment and order of this court is rendered, as the law requires wm also prays that this court order all bonds now paid in cash by Jack H. Meyer in the matters before the Harrison Co. Courts be immediately returned to him in the instruments they were tendered Those being the total sum of $4,384.00 US. And no further requirements of bond be placed on him in the matters before the Harrison Co. Courts RESPECTFULLY SUBl\/IITTED, \S\ Jack l-l.Meyer Jack H. l\/leyer, Pro Se l-louston, st. Jefferson, Texas 75657 _ , 903-665-4677 Page 21 of24 DECLARATION All statements made in these documents are sworn to be true and correct by the affidavit on page l of this document, being pages 2 through 24, with attachments #1 - #5, on the date of the affidavit \S\ lack H.l\/leyer lack H. Meyer, Pro Se Houston, st. Jefferson, Texas 75657 903-665-4677 _CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE_ 1, Jack H. Meyer, certify that a true and complete copy of this document, that being an application for a Writ of l\/Iandamus and Motion for Leave to File, Affidavit covering the facts in the documents and all other,documents included have been sent via US Certified Mail on this day 15th of Oct. , 2015 to: l. Harrison County Court at Law, 200 W Houston, l\/larshall, Texas 75670 USPO Certified mail # 7014 1820 0001 4475 3485 2. Harrison County Justice Court Prct. 4, Place l, 200 W. Houston, l\/Iarshall, Texas 75670 ' USPO Certified mail # 7014 1820 0001 4475 3478 3. Harrison County District Attorney, 200 W. Houston l\/Iarshall Texas 75670 USPO Certified mail # 7014 1820 0001 4475 3492 ` \S\ Jack H.l\/leyer Jack H. Meyer, Pro Se Houston, st. Jefferson, Texas 75657 903-665-4677 APPENDIX Exhibit #l; Texas Standard Certificate of Birth # 11514, file # 63, of 1/31/1947 of the Movant, Jack H. Meyer.

Exhibit #2; Form 1 10, lnstructed verdict in causes # 41 -68856 & 41-68857 of 10/08/2014 before the Harrison County Justice Court, Prct 4, Place Exhibit #3; Certified Mail letter from Harrison County Clerk, Patsy Cox, 3a.

3b.

3c.

3.d. received on 3/23/2015 containing: Certified mail envelope Notice or Warrant? From Harrison County Clerk Cox dated 3/16/2015, stating Bond is forfeited for failing to appear.

Sheriff’s Return Form, Blank, with cause # 2015-9859 handwritten Trial setting notice, of 3/13/2015 setting trial on 9/10/2015 for cause #2015-9859.

Statement of Baliff, for cause 2014-0801 and 2015-9859, Filed 1/27/2015, signed by BaliffHenderson. l Photocopy of personal check tendered for appeal bond, declined by HC Clerk Cox, 1 have copied my carbon copy of Casher’s Check which paid bond on the reverse side of this photocopy.

Judgment NSIS by Harrison County _ludge Joe Black filed 1/16/2015 in cause 2015-9859.

Exhibit #4; The 3/24/2015 response letter by Jack H. Meyer to the above letter, Exhibit #3, with proof of delivery card, 4 pages Page 23 of24 5. Exhibit #5: Cash Bond Documents` (4ea); # 5429 (5a), 5430 (5b), 5431 (5c), 5432 (5d). showing release for Harrison County Jail on 9/20/2015.

6. All other documents in my possession are notices from the courts and my written response with objection to them. Due to page limit of this petition they are omitted 7. 1 do not have possession of any warrants for my arrest. My only knowledge that they must exist is from the resulting action of the government.

8. No further evidence of the facts stated herein is in my possession To date no motion for discovery or subpoena for these records or evidence has made these documents available to me. All documents attached and noted in this appendix are photocopies or scans of the original documents, which have not been altered in any way. They are true and accurate copies of the original documents The certification of which is under the sworn affidavit which is attached to and part of the documents stated in that affidavit \S\ Jack H.Meyer Jack H. l\/leyer, Pro Se Houston, st._ Jefferson, Texas 75657 903-665-4677 Page 24 of24

Exhibit l »ix!...m»....-..: 1. .. .... .. . .4.. 1 .. .\_.. .....,1`...._.....,.,,1...\ ...1..1....1.3._.....:.§11.11,.:..,.11.11. .1.. . :...1`..111.)1.1.131\.;1...,....,. ;M .l....-....._.]...,.&..d.

awax. ....,-._s. .H.z;..§», serious mann v m_a.. .,.1 RY; 3 ... _ . .Dd du_=¢.rlz . i.`m.=_ou' ._§J ho uIDr¢.zW_w . Hr<q Ki__.mlm:!?z. UJ_\_“B H. .. .

.. :722 iwru_toii.. ln.wad_ . 1 1;.3..2.. ...".,._.11.1, ... .1:¢.1.¢., v .I.l. ..m..... . .. ad ¢Miih1im .rq. .v§ o..___xu n_z.». .~n E.;l ._xr. on .C_.._.zuu. >muwm: _ ... ..\.}......1. v»ln

.¥J¢_vh¢¥omz ____ ¥1_.\_»»: .......l. .17.\._.. 1 ! 1...;.11...

mm EP Pu¢l¢._ u_.hu<.._..t&sll uxh..nla. |.~. ..... .l. `Z.: ¢.\~ 41...|¥.1.1$.»..!..|'1..|1.»|1_...1 r.. \..,$. , 1. . 111 .1 ¢a_._..<....._::..._ .a.... .w~_ N .

so.».~e:o._..,. _...¢.:_P:~_ 1.._1.1.,.....:.1,.2_1 ,._- ho.h$~....n pmvuvn. .$!5__2§ n»v_::u` . so ul_.:.xxo_a uz_>§ ¥a!. a.$. .. . . .. . .:kx_a n._F».. .u¢' `_.._m!_ . . . 1.z»_._~b$ »:t. nh.z¢un..|a..`..\|>..<lrl.!.! :...__... N.i .\Z. .... :: nl »_F_. E.Pzre.a . zi¢oJ_zo d ¢u‘§;l.= . . 2 . ram .__xv no ¢w-lnz .nn

qua¢a.: __2:_. i.:.. ..,.f.o ..n oh ..ww.om . : _SZ....S _.S:S .___ $uz§; m ... .. .. .. o ..~ .w . z. !. .w. #_ =a..__§» LD »¢B_._BZ._ d-_ . .

Oll'iil‘¥'d'-\¢'| ~'N_Qu._kuo_+ 1~11 am

'r .. , 1.>_1 1 id.m.aw 1. . §3.¢&¥ 3 .. . . .....110.:¢ nw zb_»»v` .»n<. l... 1 11 .m Q, x.._..... 251 .. omdw nz_x ¢u xu_¢nu¢ . . . 1a.2_ ua$:..<! . . ._u.R ...E<¢».<n .. any ».uu ¢.»a » .:. . . .. .. .....H,,...Mr.:..,... . n .,.,. .HJ.H.H amn.m..n._. nonm¢mm¢.h. $._».».Q_…e."_ . . ... . . ».q§a..::_.._ . uaj.ax§.¢ 11.. nw 1. ..1..1 .. ::..l .. _a._..¥_ .... . .. .1. :_..- .. ., ..,.1.….| . _ .v».“.§ u.}._ `..:. . m ".»<a..b_.» ...a..c w uu“nh.. uu...~. § n . . . .. . ¢oi_oo,: ,. .. 518.¢_ 2 .. . . 11 .....: n. .....mm.HwH. ..Qpn..~u».va_.... »¢Z.B._. m.n.wob. §.omnoww.`.ow ¢U_:z:. J.. .

552.21_.: ..1 . ... ., .u___t_o:o.... O. ...1 .f. f .i.. .. ¢unzz_. ...,1, .....> ....11... ... ¢w¢.._”_¢. . ..~ . .. .…{.... :._¢3=. .. . . .. _ guvl_.__._"..imd. :.:SS_ .H ._d.n§ J.._“§ nu §§ .uc_H.. ..>.vH&P . .._.~ua___d" .11... ..-?.\.:.11. .1 hn.n¢z dawson vauu.§ . . 212 N .._.:.I£_ . . . . . . ...:_`i .l_. . suzl.al.. :...... 1 ....;... . 11.........!1.: i... ..1..1 ¢uztah.: .. .. .1 . .- W .. t_i 5 _ ._qu . . ..

13 _.aa,.. _ .a_a.» . ._._1..".:.5 ._.. 111 ., 1 .u.. ..-..._.. ._.1. .,:......,11 1. .. .11 >3. . ..__=1:¢.~......0§ 1 3 . El_h. so u:n _» vitalian .- _. .... 2 . 520 uxr§_l .u.,. c=1.L. qua . ud“. .n m :.z:nu :_» az oz< ¢¢x:,.__. H do 3 .. dow...._o o . _". ... . E.._;¢ _ of 3 . w. . .. ._ _ a 34 ; ..;:.s..x .. ,.1.1... 115 ,.,..1...1>:...1)\.__.!..$.3...1..|.1.. .u..o..."o.¥. h.c.".v.nd.mm.. .H..n.dh.:. ....z.. rn.._,_..:..e.|~w _.;i 1_.:.:. .~ .oa 3c1

.:l/'

....1 1 HHEB.UHWI\.§._?... ..._.uz.uw..f

. n z.._..m..n mo w"»..+u_..._.:.am..v a¢¢..@z¢...»». . mo;m_b;n 1._.¢:>1

Exhibit 2 T_""TC CF§|I“.'I!\L*"._ "."CLUl'»‘|E

FOR!.\ 110 GENERAL VERchT FOR1.1 cause 1\:':-.-'_£11512 4/~ da 35 521 j 4*'!- aé¢'"$$ 7 we sure o.= rast § 'N '1'4_15 inst ci :.cLRi~ vs _ § PREC'NCT_£ PL,'~ci j _ M___/@Q?M_ § maism» couhirr 12er V`ERD|CT CHOOSE ONE UF THE FO‘._LOW|NG ‘.".'e. 'he Jury', find the ccfef‘cant'gui ly as charged and assess punishmen: at $ t'lne. `

FOREPE R 50 N

DATE .-'- f amf ‘3/ .__~_-,P ;1§,_:11.'§,1, riw;q'[h»a defendant rc-t g.ii|t',.-_':,_?r;$-f¢’:x,¢é:é:¢':i . -:/M¢+Kl:’j.% C”MQ'_}) FOF’~E F‘E RSD-’.\l lNST R'.,|'CT l: :' "-,"E R LJ l CT {Z .-l.ARG E.

C.£-.U 3 E l`~l‘_."'I.B ER 11~: THE JusT!cE couRT oF _ Coumr, TE><.~“\S Paimnci'___ m11¢\<:1;_ THE BTJ~`~.TE D: TE}U‘-.S U$`J C’)‘J (-L'D 11-1¢-,0~_!10'§: of "ha .111“3: -'1.'€€~.'.' `-;'ou 'e.rvr.‘e il i'£ your '_'u*.~;' |.L> choose from among ','0111 "urrbe' a l-c'epe‘sf>r= | fl.rt|`®r instrL 1:? you t:- 211:.21_15'_ 1119 1:-9?91"1:`€11‘1; and amer ;-'1 -t-‘e'dir,t :1[ '1~.0: giii|‘.y.‘ l‘-ir_'r-.-"=’-rnbe" .:i_fllf:'- .:a;e 1 cf ‘ Exhibit 3

rd“ . _ ~_ ._._E&E .*&.~M_ .__§=_5:=_5 mg Mmmrm"w __ /»lll¢.

§§ mp@v¢_¢z YW /MM/§/M/H J/Q@

omni §§ §§ Smm.m_&~…_ §§ m§__w.+__…._._<rwa<§ _ 32 xom mcrae »wo¢ m ,

m§m t §,$S§.QQS ,V ._.: mo v 393 &N

>.c/_Doo zow&m,_`f xmw,_o E:oo ».:300 XOO >ml_,<a .. .. C..F.ZIDFWE .M.><.Q..M.`.)x KMCL<

1..__ Y,,Om §Y,,%. ww§mo@. § ,. ,H._. ...h¢;r... .

§

§E§ EQ_, __ got%~ Q£§%Cttrc THE S'I`ATE OF TEXAS `I`o any Shcriii` or any Constable within the State of 'I`exas - GREETINGS: Wl-IEREAS, on the 28“‘ DAY ()F OC'I`OBER, 2014, in a certain prosecution pending in the COUNTY COUR'l` A'I` LAW of HARRISON COUNTY, TEXAS, Cause No. 2014~0801, ` wherein THE S’I'ATE OF TEXAS is Plaintift` and JACK MEY`ER is Defendant, the said Defcndant as principal together with APPEAL BON. , as surctics, did enter into a BAIL BOND payable to thc State of Tcxas in the penal sum oi` EICI‘I'I` HUNDRED EI,GHTY FOUR DOLLARS (3884.00). ' CONDITIONED, that the said Dcfendant should make his personal appearance before said Court on the 20m DAY OF,JANUARY, 2015, then and there to answer the State ot"l`exas upon a charge by INFORMATION duly presented in said Court, wherein the said Dcfcndant is charged with the offense of 'l`RAFFIC ()FFENSE CLASS C and there remain from day to day and term to term, until discharged by due course,ot` law; and whereas, on the 20"~" I)AY OF J.¢\NUARY, 2015, before said Court, then in session, said cause was called for trial, and the said JACK MEVI£R, wholly failed to appear and answer'said accusation against him, and thereupon thc BAII., BONI) of the said JACK MEYER, was declared forfeited by said Court, and it was ORI)F.REI), ADJ`UDGED and .DECREED by said Court that thc State oi` Tcxas do have and recover of the said JACK MEYER, as principai, the sum of EIGHT HUNDR_EI) EIGHTY F()UR DOLLARS (3884.00) and of APPEAL B()Nl), as surctics, thc sum oi` ElGH'l` HUNDRED EIGH'I`Y FOUR DOLLARS (8884.00) cach, and it was further ORDERED and ADJ UDGED that said judgment should be made final, unless good cause should bc shown on the Monday next after thc expiration of twenty days from the date oi" service hereof why said Defendant did not appear.

YOU ARE THEREF()RE COMMANDED: 'l`hat. you summon the said JACK M}<)YER, Principai, and the said APPEAL BOND, Suretics. as aforesaid, to bc and appear by filing a written answer before the said COUN'I`Y C()UR'I` A'l` LAW oi` said HARRI,S()N COUNTY, on or before Monday next after expiration of twenty days from thc date ot` service hcrcol`, then and there to show cause why said forfeiture should not bc made iinal.

The officer executing this writ shall promptly scch the same according to requirements of law, and the mandates hcreof, and make due return as the law directsl li` this citation is not served within 90 days after date of issuancc, it shall bc returned unscr ed.` glssued and given un .r my hand the said of said Court at Marshall, Te.\’as, this thc LO___ day oi` \_\/\\CM , 20 \`§ AHCS ' PATSY COX Clerk Coun __ urt afle Harri on County, Tex s By: M~\ \ avoids subd . \, l])t;,pi‘\ ty cner CAUSF, Nt). §§ )§5' Ct°é Sci -CCL CRIMINAL CAUSE NO. 2014~0801

SI*IERIFF’S RETURN CAME 'l`() HAND ON THE DAY ()F , 20 AT O’CL()CK A.M., EXEUCTEI) IN

C()UNTY, 'I`EXAS, BY DELIVERING 'I`O EACH_`W“ITHIN NAMED l)lill`*`l€Nl)AN'l`, IN PERSON, A TRUE COPY OF THIS Cl'l`A'l`lON, TOCE'I`HER \VI'I`H THE ACCOIVIPANYING COPY OF JUI)GMENT NISI AT THE FOLLOWING: NAME:

l)A'l`E:

l"LACEZ

WAS N_()`fl' EXECUTED FOR THE P`OLl.()\VlNG REASON:

CERTIFICA'I`E OF DELIVERY I DO HE-R,EBY CERTIFY THAT I DELIVERED T()

, 0N THE DAY or _m_,

20 A’I` ()’CLOCK .l\’l. 'I`I:IIS (,`OPY OF` INSTREMENT. 'l`OiVl l\"IcCO()L, ‘HARRISON COUN’I`Y SHERIFF BY :

DEPU'I`Y

C>(lOl€» Q`ZSQ~QU\ tCiLED No. a/ ~ m/O¢_ JAN 2a 2015 PATsY cox, ct K wm count \i/\Rmso u Tv.rex)is . y BY _‘ _c-_ ocean 'f`l~{l'l STA'I`E OF 'I`EXAS )( l'N 'l HE COUNTY COURI 7\T )( N¢:/.//¢/j;j,$;z//¢.//é/ )( » HARRISON coUNTY,rEXAs STATEMEN'I` OF BAILIFF On the date shown below, the above styled and numbered case was called by the judge for: (chcck applicable blank) l. _____Arraignmcnt 2. _______Trial before the Court 3. ____'I`rial by jury 4. _________Revocation `Hcaring ~ 5, ___B_mai i~ieanng/At»mw The defendant did not appear.

At the behest ofthe judge presiding, and on the date shown bclow, I, acting as the duly . qualified Bailiffof the above named court, did distinctly, and three times, call the name of the above referenced defendant at the courthouse door, and the said defendant did not ‘respond, nor was there an y indication from anyone that the said defendant was present nunc ana said this M@g@_ day or W’/¢_a!_`_/M»£ ___, 20,_;§{/ ap § d §/;W Bailiff`$ printed name Q.X` w w~», § §§ ..ll

,,.. ,,.` .. l . ., . ,_,.»hx 1 §m<mz § §c»l.d= Z. ._§,E.Sz. § §§ Mm: 4 ,M ma m

\§ ..,&m ..\w\ ~ § ...W?..~._M.;\ §§ l l i; d ~,\ hl§~. §§ ,»....¢K\\.Q . U~.\,\..B\»m.\l ,L M

,.'~

§ l m>€~n l ..,..g§c+ § 533 MM z§or>» 1.".<@:.`.“,<_ v . §J,m:?»¢ $UP§H~».$.»B

`. v ..,,l z l l il .- s § .;S_IE . . - ,w.lr,“,r:~.lnll..,§.. _,..;Swm..,_.. iii la § v ....§>.,M , ..l:l,.ll,ll,.l , ,,‘ ; tll¥§§€. d

civlL CAUSE No. ®\Dl€' q %50( \ QU\ CRIM!NAL CASE No. 2014-0§01 THE STA'I`E OF TEXAS )( IN THE COUNTY COUR"§§ id §§ ‘l?':v vs. )( AT LAW HAR 16 2th

JACK MEYER )( nARRISoN COUN'rY, TEXAS JUDGMENT NISI On the 20""" DAY' JANUARY, this cause was called l`or trial and thereupon came the State of 'l`exas by her Criminal District Attorney, but the Defendant, JACK MEY’ER failed to appear and answer in his behalf, and thereupon his name was called distinctly three times at the door of the Courthouse, and a reasonable time given him after such call Was made in which to appear; yet, the Said vDei`endant came not, but Wholly made default And it appearing to the Court that the Defendant', JACK lVIEYER, together with _ APPEAL BOND, on the ZSTH DAY ()F OC'I`OBER, 2014, did enter into a BAIL B()ND, payable to thc State of 'l`exas, in the penal sum of EIGHT I~IUNDR}§D l?'§]C'H'l`Y I#`()UR_ DOLLARS ($884.00) conditioned that the Del:`endant, as principal, should well and truly make his personal appearance, instanter, before the l'lonorable County Court at Law of Harrison County, Texas, at the Courthouse of said County, in Marshall, "l`cxas, at the present term of Said Court, and there to remain from day to day and term to term ot` said Court until discharged by due course of law, then and there to answer the State of "l`exas upon a charge by information therein filed accusing him of the offense of TRAFFIC OFFENSE CLASS Cz lt is therefore considered by the Court that the State is entitled to a forfeiture of said BAIL B()ND, and it is ORDERE|), ADJ`UDGE-D and DECREED by the Court that the State o'l" 'l`exas do have and recover of and from the said JACK.MEYER, Principal, the sum of EIGHT HUN.DRED l€lGH'l`Y FOUR DOLLARS ($884.00); and in like manner that the State of 'l"eXas do have and recover of and from the said APPEAL BOND, the sum of EIGH'I` HUNDRED EIGHTY FOUR D()LLARS (3884.00) each, and that this judgment will ~l)e made linal unless oood cause be shown on the l\/londay next after the expiration o'l1 twenty days from the date citation is served, why said Det`endant did not appear. lt is further ordered that an alias capias issue for 'tth-:Hd Defendar\t. :lw§ll §., COUNTY COUR'l` A'l` l,/~\W I'l RIS()N COUNTY, TEXAS Exhibit 4 Certified Mail # 7008 3230 OO()?. 6288 9277 . AFFIDAVIT ()F PACT STATE OF TEXAS CGUNTY OP MARION BEFORE MI:`, the undersigned Notary, ROB l ]\I U'- M OORE , on this day personally appeared jack l'l. Meyer ol"l»OS l~louston st. jefferson, Texas 756$7, personally known to me to be a credible person and of lawful age, who being by me first duly sworn, on his oath, deposes and says; l received on the 2()"` ol` Mar<:h a notice oi` attempt to deliver a certified mail, #70) 2 2210 0001 9444 9626, by the LIS Postal Scrvice. Due to the late pickup of the daily mail l was unable to secure that certified mail at the LIS Post Oflice of jefferson "l`x. util about 4:0()pm on'the following Monday, the 23rd of March 2015‘ Upon reading that mail l discovered the judge of the Harrison County Court at Law has ordered the “Rearrest” oi" myself l`or “Failure to appear at What appears to be a “Pre~trial Hcaring of my appeal to that court, criminal cause No. 2015-9859~CCL (ZOl¢l_»-OSOI). ’l'he remaining hand written text on that line of the statement ol" the Bailil`l`is unrcadable.

Also, said judge ol" said court has order the forfeiture of the 588-’¥.()0 appeal bond which l have given as surety of my appearance before that court when notified l can only assume that the copy oi`my original payment ol` the bond by personal checl<, dated 10/20/2014 for the sum ol` 5884.00, is included as some kind olprool` that bond was given in this appeal However, that check was declined by the County Clerk in l`avor ol`a bank certified check for the same amount, which was given on the 23"' ol` Oct'ol)er 2014 at a cost to me of$SSS.OO. "l.`he check copied and included in this notice of default can only be a copy due to the fact that my original payment by personal check was returned to me when l turned in the certified check from the FNB jefferson 'l`x` on the 23"' ol" Oct. to and by the l'larrison county clerk, Mrs. Cox.

M}' linal and parting question to Mrs. Cox was “\vhat should l expect to be the next step in my appeal?".

Mrs. Cox stated that it would be a notice of the court of the hearing date and place \Vit.h that l returned to jeller's<)xi 7l`x. and my personal business ' /\lso, the certified notice received on March 23"l is dated as being filed on .’vla\rch 16, 2015. This is about a l`ull 5 months alter my notice ol` appeal and almost 2 months alter my alleged .Failure to appear. With this is included a notice of trial on the l()"' ol`Sep_t. 2015 at; 2:30pm. This is l month short ola l`ull year since the appeal was lilcd. `l`o this certified notice l respond as l`ollows. l . l object to its information as being almost totally FALSE!

Page l ol`$ l am a Sovereign Citizen of the State ofTexas and the United States ofAmerica. l have not contracted away in any manner any of my God given and Constitutionally protected Rights. l bring before this court “Constitut;ional Matters and lssues”. You are now required to revert to your primary and highest duty as a “j udicial <]udge” over a judicial Court of the State of'l`cxas and adjudicate my case and Challenge. l have never been notified of any hearing in the matter of my appeal in this case, #201 S-9859*CCL (2014~0801) by any means Had l been noticed of any hearing in this case l would have appeared, for multiple reasons, the least of Which is the loss of $888.00.

In the certified notice from the Harrison County Court there is no mention that l was notified»to appear for What I believe Was a pre~u'ial hearing, it simply states that I did not appear, which is true. However, absent any notice of hearing it is impossible that .l. could have appeared, and the claimed default has not happened To be “Reanested" one must be previously arrested l have never been arrested in this case! l have been threatened by the citing officer with arrest if l did not sign the citation issued All citations issued, these included, have been signed “Under Duress”. Duress being the threatened arrest by the armed officer of the la\v. ` There appears on all of the documents sent me in this certified mail post marked as being in Shrevepon. La. On the 15"` of March NO seal of the court! Absent the seal of the court these documents amount to nothing more than a personal letter to me, no different than a Christmas carti.

The above mentioned certified mail documents are marked as filed on the lo‘h oi` i`vlarch 2015 and the envelope in Which they were mailed is postmarked as being in Shrevcport La. On the 15"’ of March 20l5. May l ask how a document in a sealed envelope and in the post office of Shreveport ila be liled a day later in Marshall Tx.‘? if the documents filed on the l()`ch are truly stamped on that date then it is impossible for that Stamp to be impressed through the envelope on the 15‘h and most certainly the reach of that stamp can not be Shreveport La. The same is true of the seal of the court!

All of the above taken in sum is obviously nothing more than another blatant attempt by the administration ofthe City ofl\/larshall "l`x. and I:la’rrison Co. Tx to engage in a conspiracy to defraud lack I~l. Meyer of his God given and Constitutionally protected rights ' Pave 2 of 3 b ll.

12.

13.

The jurisdiction of my accuser and the administrative court has been challenged by me. A challenge of jurisdiction by the creator (also the employer, also the Sovereign) leaves NO Discretion to the created (also thc employee, also the fiction). Any challenge to any employee is purely an administrative matter WI'l`HOUT any discretion allowed Siniply ptit, it can not be denied or avoided by any means 'l`lie PERSONS challenged have only two options,` prove jurisdiction or dismissal of the matter at hand. That is to say, the person must cease what is questioned by the creator or prove where the creator has given authority to do what is questioned Clearly, this is not the wish of the government officials involved in this matter. lt appears those involved wish to do whatever they believe they can get away with to avoid admission that no jurisdiction exist and disobedience of the laws of this nation and state ’l`he SWORN duty of all public employees is to administer the law of their creator and employer by OBEYING it.

Clcarly, those actions demonstrate that their action and lack of action is done with knowledge that no jurisdiction exist. If this were not the case then the matter would be quickly and efficiently resolved by simply proving jurisdiction, which no one has to date done. "l`o the contrary, you have done all that you can to fool or coerce everyone into believing anyone has authority over their creator and employer You have been informed by me on repeated occasions For years now of the above information of fact. You have had every opportunity to investigate my claims and see that justice is done but, you do not. This lack ol` action alone is a demonstration of intentional will to break the law oi` this land.

A law l must remind you again to which there exist NO excuse ol`ignorance, and once authority is exceeded sovereign immunity is lost. l now repeat inv Challenge of]urisdiction ol` my accuser and the administrative courts ol`this nation and state and request a pretrial hearing in Which this jurisdiction is proven or the case he dismissed l have been and remain available for appearance before the court at almost any time. l only require timely notice of the event, in accordance with the laws of this nation and state All Right Rescrvcd, Without Prejtidicel All oi` the statements contained in this document are made by me from my own personal knowledge ol' the i`acts stated therein and are true and correct to the best oi`my ability Sworn to and subscribed before me on the Ww_zi~_/l day of ____/`/é/¢A , 2015, by MZ/% (name of amant) /?MMA; Q/. /\/\ nasa Notary ._Pubiie's 31 attire

Page 3 ol` 3

w§sm~=s»

1511 C»'<'l\“fi‘ !F:€`W

cii,»v. . ‘_¥_ (@p£'a’§ “€f:=';' ~

simmj“mwwm max m

m 11 §§”‘”1

;‘¢11*:)1\»19»1 1? [3 “~ D_'@`é 1

£'_'} access 1131 E] blum mem 'e:;'zh§x:iz;z:y:‘

l;l \§;§»`

‘.Z wmc mimch ’1¢~.';"‘" ,‘rx:vn arm \~ixw\!

F‘\’§’F:rrn 03 x "L robian l \'\:T~£

..u ;11;:1€: w;~;e ‘1§3?“’

mm:mv K §

m WWM\,“

Exhibit 5

'_ CASH SOND,

v(Elt§nt§ Nc;il _Arttz§.l mata CQ(,\r: mata , THE STAT§ U§'-‘TE>_£&S CDUNW OF H§tAR§St;)N} KNG‘\ t/ ALL MEN SY THESE PRESENT5: ` mmi t ' ~t" z z lt:>;SIS ll t~'\€~ ;;»g» tai Sum 1331v ' _ Dol arts ~cr the payment cal ».»,"ttx;':h :l:um weis and hul\; l~:t be made amd in addition alt ntamessar§~ and roa'-or“ial>tz:'fc§s and ammust that may be incur'red w peace £`;~lfic:tm~; m managing me in me event the emtd§t§mts_ of this bond am violated { tdc ii t"" mywil my haley , exacu§crs and t.dt*"uttt.~.!tdlmv §1.’:‘» lt§~' mtd §§ ~uta§ty fry miss c pra St”mts `IHE GOND£T!ON QFTHE ABOVE OBL|GAT£O`§\£ 18 SUCH that what cas l that princigal l crain stand chang with a mt<ssi@nt@anorle§'>"\ ts>~w§t: f , y "' , iii `

t 2 y " ’ ;~..-Mi 5 …M,M 001er ot Harrisf.tn'CoLGty. '1'(¢22<;3,3.v . t~_!mris on Ccunc,g`fc»):as unlth l d:xj' of 11 »y y ` tz:, clock A M. ctr mgmt notiéts LW the Court 01 pay to the Ccm"t the pti rt:ipaz S'um `o? ‘ f ~ ' montes .,‘:~,>z:m.; M....».._¢ _ W M. ,W _… 13 ~ :

tocatt;z<i-a.t' 1110 20:;;,

¢.-~»~ ~ .,. »,.\..

"‘z~r;£.;r't#

§:tus all hocce:;;try and :c‘;tsttnat§otc expenses incurred m atty ar'o:, tt:x' failure to appear flow lt'_t shall and tr t§y makes 1111 ap;)eacarzcc bt;~fott) saw Court and there renta r from day to ctay and term to term of s;id paschal ap;tca alice in ante and atl tsubscqucnt protectedth that ma;. f be had relative =0 said change trt the comm of the criminal ;t; tlon mem on said charge this ohlégatio't shal¥ become m§<t; smertvlstzm nremair ir ft,xft fonte and ` ettecth ` X j k Sl`glzs.:l_artd »d;¢:oci this the y 11 ' ti;;;.' of v . " 1 t .20 t ___i_ 5 Kl",lmlt>&l_ . ‘§wé:iz‘

Sigrtr;t§m€ . , . ......... Mf§.”..;;m.':@..€f_< i>:/ m M'tzes?.

AT`;‘;; 7';" M'”' . ;, . l,; `X ‘ '_ 3“¢¢ ,’;t’ H '. my . ; C.€lt,¢; Sl>'ne, E,’,E§: f" »"`EJ.§.»’ 1';’/- 1511 vt 1 ~1_~ jt §§ S"r 311 Dri\.-at;s L§c€zrtsez N;metzr Drivet“s Ur:ertz;e blumth l k v/ . ~ _\" §>“.: _; th ~ w /-`(. > l Phth t‘~iumha: Ptm:te Numtjz;~r

Ftecei~.¢t:~:.i 831 . ‘."’hi§c t Br;ol<’kt:~:t¢;t»/.tr fitth z L ll _Pirt§< v )‘~.ascil~;zr Ye'tiuw ~» ’§€;§Ut‘tdatn!

Bond Nc>','

§

1'1»1? :»31;».11= OFTt-_;>:,t\s THP`1 1

GAS.H;BQ.”,`~?Q’ »' 1 _ft_:_rest 13~&1'@" y W,“.t\

'£ni)rt;/D:zte

133an m me pena ¢1.511;1\1 ot"y' . thl§:gz~=§;, 1011 1119 1313 \i~:`tert1 of \vhi:;h Q',~L:m weil zmd italy 10 be ms`ce, .'z 'v‘~'i ~< 5“°'

am held and 1tr1nl y bound mich the SL=x§é 111 ` §§ 1 s ,,>"’ ) _ .,in Sxiditior.t all net:§:»;£ear§; and r§z;gor:§a§:le fé€=§ arm exps>rzsp.s 1111>,1 may be mr urrPn" by Pea¢::e "}fftc:erz$ m rear“P;-z!ing mp in the evan§ 1119 r:c‘.ndili:)xl$> 01 this wortc§ and 1'§61319£§ do h nd "rwaeli my baird exemtc)z's and Pdmini`s£rai<arts it>in':l‘; md ~qe walls ny wmata was ama THE COND\ T‘ZUN CJF `1 HE ABO\!§. OBL¥GA hON 155 SUCH that whereas 1 the prmcipal hér`eih 1312111£1` merged with

a m§§citzme“zn'tr~’f@¥on',, 113-11111; 1 t 1… 1 12 1 “ ~ z t .»» § ' ,t 1;1.:,‘11)11'311115 :`1 t §““’ 'l’.$<)url`ul Harrison Cuutliy;`Te;£uB, AD_ .~:i`, v

H¢urszor((.ount,z`¥‘em" mathe- . \ 'r upon noticed 1:"> the C;>urt m gay mt the 31211`11 tim ;>rktczpal Sttm of ~ ' ' 13 " i`* `f :da; at °““’ aims 311 1191:9§€.&1 1 and reascztat!¢= E`xpéz*\§e~> 111£1.111¢31§ 111 arm asré t 101 tai§u':a 10 ,az)pear,_ blow `l|' l

Ct;ét:z:a'w of 11112 2111: il J!!i¥¥|\`?§l. ltv :,h<"z§l well amf tguly makét term 01 Said ;:Q§Séna§a;tp¢satar'ctz in §m‘."

axis 311 sum rfqu proceedings

1 ;. f‘--»:»a

1 Dot§ars rii§id,apptz;»nmtc:tz hamm said C'cur£. zir;_t§ 1?1=.')`1‘€ 112111;1111 Z§Sm day 1131 1332 5111§ mfm hat may 122 road rt`alazl\ra w §§101 jcha¢ga.§tt m 1101’: i:e’;‘~ézd 011 5316 cl%;l#§t? 1111:1 wbltgz’sliun Sl 311 11111.1;)»1113 vuid:_ 1;1"`111?1‘/.‘:31 13 10 11311“£21¢11 111 1511 fOl‘€t': find

f Si{;nad anaheim :111$1;1§1 say"ol 1’ “ az 1 ',21:1 Pr`n:c`l{:ta¥ "’L:mt'!j 31§11§11)1& S$gna:ure I¢:l ,:- { f jj _;é ,;: fig ._` 313 f § 4 f j\,j,dg! ~:;:; A’Udr@~:\$ C§t\;. Staze, 219 C§?},". State. Zip }] x r` " iii 1551 ¢`;‘ ~’ ‘*’ U?/*:~£ jj :‘; : Dzi\'t,s's L:t:?nzstz 1\11 tmtwr e;'(.' ’ <" ‘§. ‘<..

Prmrt& Numbér

Whiia 1 Bt:c,kkaaper § Dri.»er's U»::en-»e Nt;mt§tzr Phon-;- Number' P1 ~tk Az.:n£tor `1’&11:1‘.'1 - Cl€<?and.qn`z

1 cAsH-sow

4 , 1111/§ ama 1~1<1. ' THE STA§ E OF `§EXAS CGUNTY OF HAHH\SAN`P K_NCW'\' BL`L. MEN B`!' T;~EF 35 man ~1»1¢ 1551 Texn:z 111 the pérza; sum cf: 1‘)11:1111'$ 1111 1139 p§y`men; m‘ ":.'hsch sum »11¢ ;~§§W :. ,>‘~`,\;‘

§ ,

»A:rem` Dm§~ >Coprt gate - , w ;».»1¢,,1,~

PB§S§NTS' am held and firmly bound 11:110 1!'1§ 3131§ §f <. ' ~ .‘:4 >Qj, §§ " 1

ve 11 and 1111!3110 be made ;1¢16 11' add tior_ all mmss;zry md reascrab! § 1131;3 and F:<;€z'lr>e$ that may be 1111:1111§€_| 13;.' Peace Of?`i<:els 1111¢:11"31§ 1'111§ mo 11: 1110 went mo condkicn§ cjf this 1001 .d ace \»',io|axecé_ icc kind myser mv he;rz~,

11 ‘)'; executors and administrators joint!~,' and ;~121101:1|?5~1)','1?113§§ prcs§m.~;.

THE F`,.QNDW!ON OF _T'n E ABO?'E. OBL|GATION 18 SL{Ctha1"¢“1§rc:as l, the~princ§;)&l herein,'stwqd.charged`;.vith z

' Court cast <=11'1301§» Cou*\t}';'Tex §

M .) v lonal€'d 31 Harrison 65111'1£',1, Te><as. on ;he day 1;f 17 . , 2211 ,,` . , "‘L`) 20*_______ . 01 11;11‘1`11 mims 1)1'111§ Court 1311 pa§, 10 the Comt ike ;>rmcsp&! s1er 111 § f v m §z:} d .M is 1,. ,…; v §Dol§am

;:iu:, 1111 11131;¢_;'=11:~1131 and '..;~15~'>11<1£_11:.=,&1;;;~1;¢1:'¢55 inr'u'i"ed m ;;N}‘ &_rr&B; im 1311111'.91»;3 appear. , N<;.. if 1 Sha!| . 311 and imiy marcel san appearan:.e before$ am C§ur¥ and ihere ‘P..'n_ain ?mm-d'=.\' w day amf ie?in to imm 131 Said 131111»‘101*11“-)13;1;191111»:1 ..911'1 any end 11§|<4111)91=11;;1111.*11 man §P.r:!mgs mm ms-:gr 1211 mm fpl 111\~¢~ m =.a ': 1: h.=m;¢ 111 1¥1€1» CC=LIYGC‘ 01'1§'10 Cfir¥§if`;§! 11".’:{101`1 lia;?€}d 01“; 311 id P‘hargc-> thus ;1;1!§131»)11"11 :,2111:11§ hemxme .'1;11$; ot¥‘§m£§e t:‘ fem,=`xin m §u\{ iowa and

cfiu:;'t. ( § 3 1 z y 31§11»1~;1311131.1&11:»3 :111-1111_~1 ` day 151 13 f"!/ .20 / Priv»£:igga| §§11113!~¢‘ S£g;n,aimé. Signmure _/ w g 1 , ,1 z , 1 £, j q ./`{ m ) ,1 A( 1 j 1 j ., »'1»;11:11135§ Add:es$ » § " ¢( , 5 j j / jj , ` _ fbi “ l »" ), x “'_ C;r~,'. Stme. Z;: v ( g w x ` -§,' 7 .4,?

Dri'.»s+r‘s L§»::emse, Nmnnez Djive.r`§ L%c§r;s§ Number f s j 1 ~1}

F’:`u:\ne Mumber

`1"!11€1»3 ~ E~:)c:%.k§se:)€~.il Grép:»n - Dz‘~ thz.ae Number PZ*\S< - 13111::%1111' v\1=, 1..'1'1' - §§.=,:`Fmd= m

,cAsH §§11112 §§.§§

' §§ §§§ Bond `1~'11;1, THE ST§§_`I'E @FTEX.»'A3

Arre:=1Da1a l `C§11r1 ')ate f 51331111“`1‘ C_>F HAZB13DN1KN§1‘) 1=11.1. mm 311 THE§E PRESENTS;

iHATl 1 § 13le5 §rs 1113 pi;~11$1§ 31.§_m 91 mm am mr the psympnr 1111111'111:1=. sum 111131§a11d 111113¢1»:1 1313 made and.

add tier 311 necessary and reasorgblc fees and `* expen§e§ 1131 11 3111 11»,&111<:1.111&1:11;1‘ Peace C'ffhccra 111 roj;~r naming 1119 111 11111 worn 1110 c0111'_111113115 011111;~, 1101 101 we violated dc 11: 1112 1113141=111 my héirs `€=..1`<131:11;015 and armimsm\wr$ 1011111; anda avafaly b`~ 1113£ ¢3 pras_ ernst YHE GDNDIT101`1 OFTHE PBOVE OBL!GAT©N |$ SUCH mm 1'»1'1011,:1=~ 1 the ¢nnc1;131_ here 11 manci chargeo` ._1111'1 _

)~1¢ / 1111 f ~/ »’. .\» {/, 111 ’i 1’» a ;.;/" § ' 311 1311.11»1 1 s.\'sarihrz,tl .\'izl e§x:war 1;'.';§111€1111§ if ?1»“ 'j’ 3 ” ‘> “ Court of Harrisor' County 113an `11°§.¢§,11 1331 1-'1.=111"1301113<;11111-,,`11:):;15, on 1119 1;1331;1 /’ 1 1 " » 1 ,

0 dock A M., " ski "»`

pwa~ 311 11 ;1_1':;~'.11,» arm 1411- :,1111;,11;1111 s-x;_:an:~;e$ inrzrrrier;i in amf ar'esc f-“

or noon nance by the Court. 131 pay 10 me Court tre ;:>1"1111::11:1&1 wm 1-111 ,\W'",

4 1 33 m 15 1 De:)i 11119. -' 131|111”&11;1 appear.

11!011,1 11 1 511;».111 1113 11 and .;.1r111 1 makes said appearance hefo_rg. t1115 Coud and ihere mmam mm 1;_1"1,'1'1 day :,~11'1§ 1ar,rr~1;f / 101211"1 €11?£31'.') pala&nal apps§§;i`;s:\€>~ 111 .»311'_.1 ar 11 311 .~.1111§1-:»1111€1.11;¢ f:-mr.arddmg$ 11*»:_11 may lie had 11=11.»,11\~9. m .;H:r§ aharg+z’§H-H`s€§ 1:0_1,`1&',8 crime 1211 19‘1’§11£11 action based 1111 Said charga. ihi:; obliga§mn 511'1=11§.;'130011'1»;1 ~.'r..id; 011113¢'.».3'59. m remain 11111111 force and

Dzivar";§ Lk;en§e .N 1111'113&1' §§ 3 1 3 1 1(,§* 1111-313 11111'1111;131 am `4 r§ /5.

131€11;<3111€1¢1 1331 ‘.’."1`11113 » 13031<§1;68;:113§ Ere»ari - DA

§:ffoc€i _ . l Signeé and 6:'111::1'1 11113 1123 w7_3<11_1\,1 131 f~ 3 _>1' , 120 &LUQ'B_»‘-L§ w `5:’ w ' " » »‘ ` 55 M , ...." … _ 1 MW.. .w >':$igr{:§¥wé Sign€rmiq -1 1 ' wl M‘ » 1 x 1 ' 1 , 11 13 /.1 .,. 1 ,11" _ ‘~ ,~» § 1»*»` » /: `°"¥ wares/s Add:eas “' ", x 3 96 3 1 , 1~ v 1 1 ~~ y F» “ jj m: ‘ 11 1 1 ' ' "`~” »1““1»:1 ”‘ j. g 33 f C;x_~_ gram 211: 13113'1. 81;11@. Z:;: . A"` ' 1 ' » g w 1°""" 11 1 11 1 ; d § 13 g 333 131 72 33 13 f <?;, 51 1 w , 03- M § Dri"ers Uce.nse Num$:»ér \Phrme Nr,kqber‘ v Pi.wk ~ +‘11.':§:2101' \’P.$$:~.v» - Safenri,=.m