IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-91,936-03, -04, -05, -06

IN RE THE STATE OF TEXAS EX REL. KIM OGG, Relator v. 228TH DISTRICT COURT

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS IN THE 228TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam. Keller, P.J., filed a dissenting opinion joined by Yeary, J.; Hervey, J., filed a concurring opinion joined by Newell and Walker, J.J.; Newell, J., filed a concurring opinion joined by Hervey and Walker, J.J.

ORDER The Harris County District Attorney, in these mandamus applications, asks this Court to order the trial court to rescind its orders compelling the State to make discovery disclosures to the Real Parties in Interest. Before its filing in this Court, the State sought mandamus relief in the First Court of Appeals, as it is required to do, and the First Court denied relief.1 Padilla v. McDaniel, 122 S.W.3d 805 (Tex.Crim.App. 2003). This Court issued stays of the trial court’s orders pending disposition of the mandamus applications.

We deny mandamus relief. See In re State ex rel. Weeks, 391 S.W.3d 117 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2013); In re McCann, 422 S.W.3d 701 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The stays of the trial court’s orders are lifted.

Filed: September 15, 2021 Do not publish

The underlying cases are: Texas v. Armstrong, Appeal Nos. 01-20-00644-CR (trial no. 1680891), 01-20-00645-CR (trial no. 1684289), and 01-20-00646-CR (trial no. 1684291) (the - mandamus); Texas v. Reyna, Appeal Nos. 01-20-00647-CR (trial no. 1680886), 01-20-00648- CR (trial no. 1680887), 01-20-00649-CR (trial no. 1680888), and 01-20-00650-CR (trial no. 1680897) (the -06 mandamus); Texas v. Gonzales, Appeal No. 01-20-00609-CR (trial no. 1680894) (the -03 mandamus); and Texas v. Wood, Appeal Nos. 01-20-00612-CR (trial no. 1680890) and 01-20-00617-CR (trial no. 1680898) (the -04 mandamus).