UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT December 13, 2019 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

RONALD SANDERS, § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-293 § JONATHON A. CHISUM, et al, § § Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND RETAIN CASE On November 8, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his “Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Certain Claims and Retain Case” (D.E. 8). Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b);

(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc.,

(5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 8), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Court RETAINS the claims against Officer Jonathon A. Chisum, DISMISSES all claims for money damages against all Defendants in their official capacities, and DISMISSES all claims against the remaining Defendants for failure to state a claim and/or as frivolous pursuant to

(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). ORDERED this 13th day of December, 2019.

NE bh GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2