Ramirez v. The State Of Texas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT December 30, 2019 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION JESSE LEE RAMIREZ, § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-272 § THE STATE OF TEXAS, et al, § § Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION On November 21, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge B. Janice Ellington issued her Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 12), recommending that Plaintiff’s action be dismissed for want of prosecution and failure to comply with court deficiency orders.

Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been filed.

When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).

Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 12), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of prosecution and for failure to comply with the initial deficiency orders.

ORDERED this 30th day of December, 2019.

Jah GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2/2