IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

§ JERRY DEFOREST GRAVES, III, § § Petitioner, § § v. § Case No. 6:19-CV-304-JDK-JDL § UNITED STATES, § § Respondent. §

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner Jerry Deforest Graves, III, proceeding pro se, filed the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus. This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to

. On July 15, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 11), recommending that the petition be dismissed as moot because Petitioner already received the relief he was seeking. A return receipt indicating delivery to Petitioner was received by the Clerk on July 29, 2019 (Docket No.12). This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and Recommendation.

(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other grounds by statute,

(b)(1) (extending the time to file objections from ten to fourteen days). Here, Petitioner did not file objections in the prescribed period. The Court therefore reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and reviews his legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989), cert. denied,

(1989) (holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law’). Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 11) as the findings of this Court. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report (Docket No.11) be ADOPTED. It is further ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All motions not previously ruled on are DENIED. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 20th day of August, 2019. qe D Kobe JERQMY D, RERNODIE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 2 of 2