Brown v. Rusk County Prosecutor

District Court, E.D. Texas

Brown v. Rusk County Prosecutor

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION JIMMIE LEWIS BROWN § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19cv496 RUSK COUNTY PROSECUTOR, ET AL. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Jimmie Lewis Brown, an inmate confined in the Wynne Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, brings this civil rights action against several defendants. Analysis The Civil Rights Act,

42 U.S.C. § 1981

, et. seq., under which this case is brought, does not contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue is controlled by

28 U.S.C. § 1391

. Jones v. Bales,

58 F.R.D. 453

(N.D. Ga. 1972), aff’d per curiam,

480 F.2d 805

(5th Cir. 1973). When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship,

28 U.S.C. § 1391

provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in which the claim arose. Plaintiff complains of events which occurred in Rusk County, Texas. Plaintiff claims therefore arose in Rusk County. In addition, the individual defendants appear to reside in Rusk County. Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 124

, Rusk County is located in the Eastern District of Texas. As a result, venue regarding plaintiff’s claims is proper in this court. However, while Rusk County is in the Eastern District of Texas, it is in the Tyler Division, rather than the Beaumont Division. When a case is filed in the wrong division, the court “shall dismiss, or if it be in the interests of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.”

28 U.S.C. § 1406

(a). Accordingly, this lawsuit will be transferred to the Tyler Division of this court. ORDER For the reasons set forth above, it is ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the Tyler Division of this court.

2

Reference

Status
Unknown