IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ABILENE DIVISION

NANCY MORROW, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Vv. ) ) EASTLAND COUNTY, TEXAS, ) ) Defendant. ) Civil Action No. 1:16-CV-118-C-BL

ORDER Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge advising the Court that Defendant’s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted as to all remaining claims. Plaintiffs timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendations on June 24, 2019. The Court conducts a de novo review of those portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely objection is made.

(b)(1)(C). Portions of the report or proposed findings or recommendations that are not the subject of a timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989). After due consideration, the Court finds that Plaintiffs’ objections should be OVERRULED. The Court has further conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge’s findings and conclusions and finds no error. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, Defendant’s Amended Motion for

Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED on all remaining claims asserted in the above-styled and -numbered civil action. The a shall enter judgment on even date. dh SO ORDERED this Ab day of June, 2019.

Af yz [ / po yf} “Ny \_ SAMO CYfinriNGS ~SEMOR ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE