Glaspie v. Holmes
Glaspie v. Holmes
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION KEVIN NEAL GLASPIE, ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) No. 3:17-CV-3171-B ) TRACY HOLMES, et al., ) Defendants. ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclu- sions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with
28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. By separate judgment, the plaintiff's claims against the judge, assistant district attorney, the three defense attorneys, the officer in his official capacity, and the complainant for perjury or lying at trial will be DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). His remaining claims against the officer in his individual capacity and the complainant for entrapment and false imprisonment will also be DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous under § 1915(e) (2) (B) until he satisfies the conditions in Heck v. Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477(1994). SIGNED this 21 day of June , 2019.
JANE J. BOY UTED ST S DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown