UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT February 03, 2020 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

QUIRINO TORRES JR., § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-278 § BEE COUNTY JAIL, et al, § § Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS CASE

On December 30, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge B. Janice Ellington issued her “Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case” (D.E. 10). Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b);

(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc.,

(5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 10), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the complaint (D.E. 1) is DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED that this dismissal count as a “strike” for purposes of

(g) and that the Clerk of Court forward a copy of this Order and the underlying Memorandum and Recommendation to the Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas at Three □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ ORDERED this 3rd day of February, 2020. Jbl GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2