UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT February 18, 2020 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

SOPHY TREADWAY, et al, § § Plaintiffs, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-259 § SOPHEAK OTERO, et al, § § Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (D.E. 120). On January 29, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his “Memorandum and Recommendation” (D.E. 133), recommending that the motion be granted. The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b);

(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No timely objections have been filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc.,

(5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 133), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the motion for partial summary judgment (D.E. 120) is GRANTED. ORDERED this 18th day of February, 2020. Jbl GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2