Teixeira v. Wainwright
Teixeira v. Wainwright
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT February 18, 2020 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
LUKE C. TEIXEIRA, et al, § § Plaintiffs, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-303 § DALE WAINWRIGHT, et al, § § Defendants. §
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
On January 7, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his “Memorandum and Recommendation” (D.E. 12), recommending that the claim of J.L. Cox be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court’s Order (D.E. 7) and that this action be closed. The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b);
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc.,
434 F.3d 303, 308(5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 12), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the claims of Plaintiff J.L. Cox are DISMISSED. Because the claims of the other two Plaintiffs, Rodney Johnson and Luke Teixeira, are proceeding under other case numbers, this action is closed. ORDERED this 18th day of February, 2020. Joh GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2/2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown